Crystallography & Symmetry
patterns derived from their groups
Concept

Coincidence site lattice — where it appears

The lattice of points shared by two rotated copies of one lattice, whose index in either of them is the number written as sigma. A boundary built on such an orientation costs less than a general one, because a fraction of the atoms are already where both sides want them.

Named by 9 essays across 3 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

Σ5: two square lattices at 36.87°. Two square lattices, one turned through 36.87° about a shared point. At this angle one point in 5 lands exactly on a point of the other lattice — 29 of the 149 drawn — and those shared points are themselves a lattice, the coincidence site lattice, of index 5. The angle comes from tan(θ/2) = 1/3, and Σ is the odd part of 3² + 1² = 10. Nothing here is measured: whether a point is shared is decided by an integer congruence.

Turn a lattice against itself and almost nothing lines up

Two copies of one lattice rotated about a shared point share that point and, at almost every angle, no other. At a discrete set of angles they share a whole sublattice — one point in three, or five, or seven — and a grain boundary built on such an orientation costs a fraction of what a general one costs, because a fraction of the atoms are already where both sides want them.

applied · Interfaces Every coincidence index is odd. The rotations that bring a cubic lattice into coincidence with itself, up to index 25: 17 distinct relations across 12 indices, each found by enumerating integer quaternions and each index computed as the size of a sublattice rather than from the usual formula — the two are then required to agree. 5 of the 12 indices carry more than one relation, which is why the tables write 13a and 13b. Every index is odd. That is not a feature of this range: a rational orthogonal matrix written in lowest terms has an odd denominator, so the factors of two always cancel.

Every coincidence index is odd, and in the plane most of them do not exist

The indices at which two copies of a cubic lattice share points are 3, 5, 7, 9, 11 and every odd number after them. There is a two-line proof that no even index can occur. Ask the same question about a square lattice and the answer is a different list entirely, governed by which numbers are sums of two squares — so Σ3, which is the commonest boundary in every metal, has no plane analogue at all.

applied · Interfaces 13 of one on 12 of the other. Two rows of atoms whose spacings are in the ratio 1.042. Every 12 cells of the substrate come to within 3.97 per cent of 13 cells of the film, so the two are nearly in register at those points and out of register between them. There is no exact coincidence anywhere, and there cannot be: exact coincidence needs the ratio to be rational, and no measured ratio is.

Two different lattices never coincide, and the question becomes how nearly

Grow one crystal on another and their spacings are in a ratio that no measurement ever makes rational, so exact coincidence is unavailable in principle. What is left is the best rational approximation inside a tolerable repeat — a quantity that jumps rather than drifts as the ratio changes, and whose acceptability is decided by elasticity rather than by arithmetic.

applied · Interfaces 6°: a boundary with a dislocation every 9.5 cells. Two crystals of the same lattice, each turned by half of 6 degrees in opposite senses, meeting on the dashed line. Almost everywhere along it the atoms of one side face the atoms of the other at very nearly the right distance — the boundary is good crystal — and at the marked places the misfit has accumulated to a whole lattice vector and an extra half-plane has to be inserted. Those are the edge dislocations, and they are 9.5 cells apart against the 9.6 that Frank's formula gives.

A small angle is a row of dislocations

Turn one crystal a degree against another and the coincidence arithmetic says they share almost nothing. The boundary between them is nevertheless nearly perfect crystal, and both statements are true: the misfit stays small for a long way and then, all at once, needs an extra half-plane.

applied · Interfaces Σ5: three lattices in one picture. Two copies of the square lattice turned by 36.87 degrees against one another — one drawn pale, one drawn in the second colour — with the points they share ringed. The fine dots are the lattice generated by both together, the DSC lattice, which contains each crystal with index 5 exactly as the coincidences sit inside each crystal with index 5. Three lattices nested at the same index, and the middle one is the crystal.

The dislocations a boundary allows

Two crystals meeting at a coincidence angle share one lattice and generate another. The second is where a boundary's own defects live, its shortest vector is one over the square root of the index, and a dislocation's energy is the square of that.

applied · Interfaces A 21.79° twist, and the cell its beat has. Two copies of the same lattice, one turned. The coarse pattern a reader sees is the beat between them, and the outlined cell is computed from the two lattices rather than measured off the picture: the moiré reciprocal lattice is the original acted on by (I − R), so the moiré cell is the original scaled by one over twice the sine of half the twist, and turned through a right angle plus half the twist.

A beat is not a period

Lay one lattice on another and turn it: the coarse pattern that appears has a spacing anyone can compute, a over twice the sine of half the twist, and it exists at every angle whatever. Whether the superposition actually repeats is a different question with a different answer — countably many angles say yes, and at most of those the true cell is larger than the beat by a definite factor. On a square net it always is.

applied · Interfaces No two cubic grains are more than sixty-three degrees apart. For each proper class: how many rotations describe one misorientation, the largest disorientation there is, and the mean over uniformly random orientations. The maximum is found by sampling and then climbing locally, so it is a lower bound that has stopped moving rather than a solved value — and it lands on the numbers the literature records.

The angle two grains differ by

A crystal's axes are not labelled, so a relative orientation between two grains has as many descriptions as the symmetry allows — five hundred and seventy-six of them for a cubic crystal — and their rotation angles run from a few degrees to more than a hundred and seventy. The honest answer is the smallest, and its largest possible value is a number: no two cubic grains are more than sixty-three degrees apart, whatever anybody does to them.

applied · Interfaces Identical layers, each turned by an angle no number of turns undoes. Plan views of 4 layers of a stack. Each layer is the same square lattice with one cell shaded and one direction drawn, and each is turned from the one below through the angle whose cosine is three fifths, about 53.13 degrees. That angle is not a rational part of a full turn, so no number of layers brings the drawn direction back to where it started. A tiling of space with this structure has a symmetry that turns one layer onto the next and climbs one layer, and it has no translation.

Aperiodic is two words in space

A tile is aperiodic when none of its tilings is periodic, and periodic has been read two ways: a tiling with a translation, or a tiling with infinitely many symmetries. In the plane those are one condition, provably. In space they come apart, and a prism found in 1988 sits exactly in the gap.

aperiodic · Monotile The turns that keep the join discrete. Two copies of p4 on one square lattice, one turned against the other, with the shortest translation their union generates. At a turn whose cosine and sine are both rational the translations are a lattice, and its shortest vector is one over the square root of Σ — where Σ is the odd part of p² + q² for the rational point (p, q) — which the measurement reproduces to six places at every one tried. At a whole number of degrees other than a multiple of ninety there is no such point, and the search finds shorter translations the further it runs.

Two patterns laid over one another

Compose two plane groups rather than two operations. The group generated by both is one of the seventeen or is not discrete at all, with nothing between — and it takes two conditions, one on the rotation orders and one on the turn between the lattices. The turns that work have rational cosines, which by a theorem of Niven's means none of them is a whole number of degrees.

operations · Composition

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Grain boundaryMisorientationSublatticeBurgers vectorDiscretenessDislocationIndexMisfitQuaternionAperiodicityClosureCommensurate

All concepts