The space groups in class mm2 (P), counted
Every way of attaching translations to the generators of mm2 (P): 64 assignments close into a group of the right size, 16 survive moving the origin, and 10 survive relabelling the axes — which is the number the International Tables record for this class. the ten primitive orthorhombic groups with a polar axis.
4 essays call
class-enumeration. The drawing above is what it returns with no arguments at all; every
call below passes it something, because a placement that passes nothing draws whichever member
of the family the generator happens to default to rather than the one its essay argues about.
Every one of this site's 393 essays names its parameters at the
call site, which the standard pass of 2026-08-09 established and param-floor
holds.
Where it is called
Changing this generator changes every one of these figures.
Sixteen candidates, ten groups
One point group, one lattice, and every consistent way of attaching translations to it — enumerated in full. The count comes out at sixteen, and then at ten, and the step between the two numbers is a decision about what "the same group" means rather than an arithmetic fact.
One symmorphic group per class
Every arithmetic crystal class holds exactly one space group in which some origin clears every translation part at once. That bijection is why there are seventy-three symmorphic space groups and seventy-three arithmetic classes, and it is checked here class by class rather than counted.
How many axes there are is a Sylow count
Sylow's theorems say that the subgroups of prime-power order in a finite group are all conjugate and that how many there are is congruent to one modulo the prime. Applied to the thirty-two crystal classes that arithmetic counts axes: the number of Sylow 3-subgroups is the number of equivalent threefold directions, it is four in exactly five classes, and those five are the cubic ones. So cubic has a definition with no geometry in it.
The table that decides every action
Burnside's lemma counts orbits and stops there — two completely different actions with the same orbit count are indistinguishable to it. The object that settles the whole question is a square table whose entries count fixed cosets: lower triangular because a subgroup fixes no coset of anything smaller, positive on the diagonal because it fixes its own, and therefore invertible. Inverting it turns a list of fixed-point counts back into the orbits themselves.