Crystallography & Symmetry
patterns derived from their groups
Generator

The seventeen wallpaper groups

The seventeen wallpaper groups
The seventeen wallpaper groups. Every way of repeating a pattern across the plane, one cell of each. Each tile was generated from its group's operations and then examined independently to confirm it has exactly those symmetries and no others.

Every way of repeating a pattern across the plane, one cell of each. Each tile was generated from its group's operations and then examined independently to confirm it has exactly those symmetries and no others.

11 essays call seventeen. The drawing above is what it returns with no arguments at all; every call below passes it something, because a placement that passes nothing draws whichever member of the family the generator happens to default to rather than the one its essay argues about. Every one of this site's 393 essays names its parameters at the call site, which the standard pass of 2026-08-09 established and param-floor holds.

Where it is called

Changing this generator changes every one of these figures.

The seventeen wallpaper groups. Every way of repeating a pattern across the plane, one cell of each. Each tile was generated from its group's operations and then examined independently to confirm it has exactly those symmetries and no others. The classification

The seventeen

Every way of repeating a pattern across a flat surface, exhibited rather than tabulated. The number is a theorem with a finite proof, and the proof is walkable in an afternoon.

 The five plane lattices. Every periodic pattern in the plane repeats on one of five lattices. The classification is by which point symmetries the lattice itself admits, and the five are exhaustive — a sixth would need a rotation order no lattice can carry. Lattices

Five lattices, and no others

A repeating grid can be oblique, rectangular, centred, square or hexagonal. That is the complete list for the plane, and the argument that closes it is a page long.

 The wallpaper group p4m. A pattern with the symmetry of p4m, generated by applying the group's 8 operations to an asymmetric motif and repeating across the lattice. The symmetries of the result were then found independently and match the group exactly. The classification

Reading Hermann–Mauguin

p4g looks like a licence plate and is in fact a set of instructions. Half an hour with the rules turns the seventeen from a list to be memorised into a notation that can be read.

 The wallpaper group p3m1. A pattern with the symmetry of p3m1, generated by applying the group's 6 operations to an asymmetric motif and repeating across the lattice. The symmetries of the result were then found independently and match the group exactly. The classification

p3m1 and p31m

Two groups with the same lattice, the same point group and the same number of operations, differing only in where the mirrors sit. The pair is the clearest evidence that position is as much a part of a symmetry as presence.

 Doing one after another. Two symmetries of a pattern, and the one that doing both lands on. The third picture is not a new operation drawn to fit — it is the composition, and it was already in the group. Operations

Why it is a group and not a list

The symmetries of a pattern cannot be chosen independently. Do two of them in succession and the result is forced to be a third, which is why there is no eighteenth wallpaper for anybody to invent.

 The seven frieze groups. Every way of repeating a motif along a strip. Seven, and no more: the only ingredients are a translation, a mirror across the strip, a mirror along it, a half-turn and a glide, and most combinations of those turn out to generate one another. The classification

Seven friezes

The same classification argument on a strip instead of a plane, where it is short enough to check by hand. Seven ways to repeat a motif along a line, with names like hop, step and sidle.

 The seventeen sorted by lattice: 2, 5, 2, 3, 5. The five plane lattices, each drawn from the basis every other figure here uses, with the wallpaper groups that sit on it and the order of each against its lattice's holohedry. The counts are 2, 5, 2, 3, 5, which is seventeen again, arrived at by a different route from the case analysis on rotation order. Two relations hold and both are checked. Every group's order divides its lattice's holohedry, because an operation has to map the lattice onto itself before it can map the pattern onto itself — which is why a quarter turn has nowhere to live but a square lattice. And the converse fails on every one of the five: each lattice carries at least one group whose order falls short of what the lattice offers, so knowing the lattice narrows the group to a handful of candidates and never to one. The pairs printed in the accent colour are the groups that take everything their lattice permits. The classification

The classification proof, one branch at a time

Seventeen is a theorem, and the argument that establishes it is a finite case analysis that fits on a few pages. Working through it is the difference between knowing the number and knowing why there is no eighteenth.

 One lattice, two cells, and the absences the choice creates. The same set of points described on a centred rectangular cell and on its primitive rhombic cell, with what the centred description scatters. Half the reflections vanish, and they vanish because of how the cell was drawn rather than because of anything the crystal does. Lattices

Why the bigger cell wins

A centred cell has twice the area it needs and crystallography prefers it anyway. The preference is not conservatism — it buys operations that read as whole numbers along the axes, and the price is a set of reflections that vanish for reasons having nothing to do with the crystal.

 Six classifications, and which are enumerated here. The families of symmetry groups by how many directions they repeat in and how many they live in. The thirty-two crystal classes, the seven friezes and the seventeen plane groups are each built from their own operations and counted. The seventy-five rod groups, the eighty layer groups and the two hundred and thirty space groups are numbers from the literature, marked as such wherever they appear: reaching them needs the translation extensions and their equivalences in full, which is the content of the classification rather than an application of it. The subperiodic cases sit exactly between the two halves, which is why they are so easy to assume are already known. The classification

A layer is not a wallpaper

A sheet repeats in two directions and lives in three, and its symmetry group is not one of the seventeen. There are eighty of them, the difference between one and another is a single sign per operation, and the arithmetic that supplies those signs is the arithmetic of a two-coloured pattern.

 The seventeen signatures, and the seventeen groups. Every combination of features costing exactly two, beside the plane group each one names. The left column is produced by an accounting identity that has never heard of a lattice; the right by reading seventeen groups' own operations — their rotation centres and orders, which of those lie on mirrors, and how many closed curves the mirror lines make once equivalent lines are identified. The map between the two lists is a bijection, and the figure does not appear unless it is one — in both directions. A signature with no group and a group whose signature is not on the list are both refused, and so is the failure that actually happens: two groups deriving one signature, which costs exactly two and passes every check but injectivity. The classification

Seventeen dollars

Conway's magic theorem prices the features a folded-up pattern can have — a handle costs two, a mirror boundary one, a cone point of order n almost one — and requires the total to come to exactly two. There are seventeen ways to pay, and the classification falls out of an accounting identity that never mentions a lattice.

 How much a count of descriptions over-counts. For each plane group that has any two-colouring at all: how many colourings it has, how many designs those come to, and the ratio between them. Over the seventeen the ratio is 1.61, and group by group it runs from 1.00 — where nothing is identified — to 3.50 at p2, whose seven colourings fall into one class of six and one of one. The tick on each row is that row's largest single class, and it is at least the bar and usually more. The largest class anywhere is p2's 6, and that same group over-counts by only 3.50, because a factor is a mean over the group's classes and a mean reaches its largest term only when every term equals it. Reading the largest class as the over-count is therefore an over-statement, always. And the factor varies from group to group, which is why no single correction turns a count of descriptions into a count of designs after the fact. The classification

Seventy-four colourings, forty-six groups

This site counts the two-colourings of the seventeen and gets seventy-four. The literature says there are forty-six two-colour wallpaper groups. Both numbers are right, and the gap between them is a disagreement about when two coloured patterns are the same pattern.

The whole library · All essays