Crystallography & Symmetry
patterns derived from their groups
Generator

Two species on one lattice, ordered at index 2

Two species on one lattice, ordered at index 2
Two species on one lattice, ordered at index 2. Every position is a lattice point of the parent and none of them has moved. What has changed is which atom sits where: the larger marks are a sublattice of index 2, the smaller ones its other 1 coset, and the outlined cell is the new repeat. The lattice of positions is untouched and the repeat of the contents is 2 times as large, which is the whole of what an ordering transition does and the reason its signature is in reciprocal space rather than in the positions.

Every position is a lattice point of the parent and none of them has moved. What has changed is which atom sits where: the larger marks are a sublattice of index 2, the smaller ones its other 1 coset, and the outlined cell is the new repeat. The lattice of *positions* is untouched and the repeat of the *contents* is 2 times as large, which is the whole of what an ordering transition does and the reason its signature is in reciprocal space rather than in the positions.

4 essays call superstructure. The drawing above is what it returns with no arguments at all; every call below passes it something, because a placement that passes nothing draws whichever member of the family the generator happens to default to rather than the one its essay argues about. Every one of this site's 393 essays names its parameters at the call site, which the standard pass of 2026-08-09 established and param-floor holds.

Where it is called

Changing this generator changes every one of these figures.

Two species on one lattice, ordered at index 2. Every position is a lattice point of the parent and none of them has moved. What has changed is which atom sits where: the larger marks are a sublattice of index 2, the smaller ones its other 1 coset, and the outlined cell is the new repeat. The lattice of positions is untouched and the repeat of the contents is 2 times as large, which is the whole of what an ordering transition does and the reason its signature is in reciprocal space rather than in the positions. Lattices

The reflections a superlattice adds

Centring a lattice makes reflections vanish. Ordering two kinds of atom onto a sublattice makes new ones appear, exactly n − 1 of them per parent cell, and their intensity is a difference rather than a sum — which is why an ordered alloy of two neighbouring elements can be invisible to X-rays and obvious to neutrons.

 Sums of two squares, arriving as superstructures. Which indices admit a sublattice of the same shape as the square lattice, drawn as a bar per index whose height is how many there are. The pattern is not a pattern about lattices at all: an index works exactly when it is a sum of two squares, because a similar sublattice of the square lattice is multiplication by a Gaussian integer and its index is that integer's norm. The indices that work up to 30 are 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 10, 13, 16, 17, 18, 20, 25, 26, 29, and the same list is produced here a second time by factorising rather than by searching, with the two required to agree. Lattices

The sublattices that are the same shape

Thinning a lattice usually changes its shape. Sometimes it does not: the sublattice is the parent rotated and scaled, and a drawing of it alone would be a drawing of the parent. Which indices allow it turns out to be a question Fermat answered in 1640.

 A gap of exactly 1.00. The two folded bands with the ordering switched on. The faint curves are the same bands before it, crossing at the boundary of the reduced zone; the ordering couples them there and separates them by exactly twice its own strength. The gap appears at the wavevector where the superlattice's extra reflections appear, and for the same reason: both are the Fourier component of the potential at that wavevector. Lattices

A bigger cell, a smaller zone

Ordering two kinds of atom onto a sublattice adds reflections to the diffraction pattern and opens a gap in the levels. It is one fact told twice: the same Fourier component of the potential, at the same wavevector, doing the same thing.

 Two populations, and neither of them empty. The reflections of a structure in which three quarters of the atoms are paired by a half-cell shift, sorted by the parity of h + k and each class scaled by its own mean. The two histograms have the same shape, which is the point: each class on its own is an ordinary acentric distribution. What differs is the scale — the odd class is a sixth of the even one on average — and no odd reflection is absent, so no extinction rule fires and nothing about the space group is affected. How it is known

A translation that is nearly there

Half a structure copied onto the other half by a half-cell shift, with nothing exact about it. No reflection vanishes, so no extinction rule fires — and the test for a centre of symmetry answers yes about a structure that has none.

The whole library · All essays