Which rotation orders each dimension permits
An n-fold rotation of a lattice is an integer matrix of order n, and the smallest one lives in φ(n) dimensions. Every order up to 14, against the dimensions drawn here: 2 admits 1, 2, 3, 4, 6; 3 admits 1, 2, 3, 4, 6; 4 admits 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12.
7 essays call
totient-restriction. The drawing above is what it returns with no arguments at all; every
call below passes it something, because a placement that passes nothing draws whichever member
of the family the generator happens to default to rather than the one its essay argues about.
Every one of this site's 393 essays names its parameters at the
call site, which the standard pass of 2026-08-09 established and param-floor
holds.
Where it is called
Changing this generator changes every one of these figures.
The restriction in three dimensions
Space is roomier than the plane in every other respect, so the natural expectation is that it permits more rotation orders. It permits exactly the same five, and seeing why is more interesting than the result.
Where five-fold becomes legal
A five-fold rotation with whole-number entries exists — in four dimensions, as a four-by-four matrix that can be written down. The plane forbids it because the plane is too small, and knowing which dimension is large enough changes what a quasicrystal is.
Icosahedral symmetry
Sixty rotations, six fivefold axes, and no lattice in three dimensions that can hold any of them. It is the point group a crystal is forbidden, and the one the first quasicrystal turned out to have.
Why there is a list at all
Five lattices, seventeen groups, thirty-two classes, two hundred and thirty. Every one of those counts came out of a search that had to know when to stop, and the reason it could stop is a divisibility Minkowski proved in 1887.
Eight-fold, with the golden ratio taken out
Every quasicrystal on this site has been built on five: Penrose's rhombs, the Fibonacci chain, the ten-fold pattern Shechtman measured. A method that works only on the golden ratio is a method tuned to its answer — so here is the same construction run on eight, where the irrational is √2 and nothing else changes.
The restriction, with no lattice assumed
The proof that only two-, three-, four- and six-fold rotations are possible is usually stated about a lattice, and every step of it turns out to need no lengths at all. A periodic graph has the same theorem, proved the same way — and a graph may have a five-fold symmetry the plane cannot receive.
Four root systems, and the same four rotations
Two mirrors meeting at an angle generate a group. Ask that the group be finite and that a certain pairing between the mirrors come out a whole number, and the angle has only four possible values — from which the rotations that survive are of order two, three, four and six. The crystallographic restriction arrives with no lattice anywhere in the argument.