Crystallography & Symmetry
patterns derived from their groups
Series

Quasicrystals — the series

10 essays on one idea, from the one that introduces it to the one that assumes the rest.
  1. A diffraction pattern with tenfold symmetry. Sharp spots, arranged with a symmetry that no periodic crystal can have. When the ten-fold case was measured in 1982 the immediate reaction was that the sample must be a twinned crystal, because the alternative was that a theorem with a one-line proof had a case nobody had considered. The star of reciprocal vectors is a parameter here, so the eight- and twelve-fold patterns that were found afterwards come out of the same call.

    What Shechtman measured

    A diffraction pattern with sharp spots and tenfold symmetry, in April 1982. Sharpness meant order and tenfold meant no lattice, and the two had been believed inseparable — so the interesting question is what the observation had to rule out before it could mean anything.

    part 1 · aperiodic
  2. The substitution, 6 generations. The rule "every long tile becomes a long and a short, every short tile becomes a long", applied 6 times from a single tile. Each generation is as long as the previous two together, so the tile counts are Fibonacci numbers — 13 long and 8 short at the last row — and their ratio is 1.62500 against the golden ratio's 1.61803. The sequence never repeats and every finite piece of it recurs infinitely often, which is order without periodicity in its smallest form.

    The smallest quasicrystal

    Two tile lengths on a line, in the golden ratio, in a sequence that never repeats. Three completely different constructions produce it, they are required here to agree, and its diffraction needs two integers per peak where a periodic chain needs one.

    part 2 · aperiodic
  3. The icosahedral group, counted. The sixty rotations of an icosahedron, found by trying every map that sends one adjacent pair of vertices to another and keeping those that carry the whole vertex set onto itself. They fall into 6 axes of order 5, 10 axes of order 3, 15 axes of order 2 — and the fivefold axes are the reason this group cannot be the point group of any crystal, since no three-dimensional lattice admits a rotation of order five. Quasicrystals have it anyway, which is what made 1982 an argument rather than a measurement.

    Icosahedral symmetry

    Sixty rotations, six fivefold axes, and no lattice in three dimensions that can hold any of them. It is the point group a crystal is forbidden, and the one the first quasicrystal turned out to have.

    part 3 · aperiodic
  4. Sliding the window catches different points. The periodic lattice that cut-and-project starts from, with the strip drawn at two positions 0.21 apart, which is 15 per cent of the window's width. Most lattice points are caught by both; a few are caught by one and not the other, and those are the whole difference between two quasicrystals. The slope has not changed, so the density, the two tile lengths and the ratio of their frequencies are identical — the offset is a parameter with no energy attached to it, which is what makes a phason a degree of freedom rather than a defect.

    The freedom a crystal has not

    Slide the window of a cut-and-project construction and the tiling changes — different tiles in different places — while its density, its tile ratio and its diffraction pattern do not. That parameter is a phason, it costs nothing, and no local measurement whatever can determine where it sits.

    part 4 · aperiodic
  5. A quasilattice down a 5-fold axis: 10-fold, from an axis of order 5. 153 points of a three-dimensional quasilattice, made by keeping the points of Z⁶ whose perpendicular image lies inside a window and projecting them into ordinary space, then viewed along one of its 5-fold axes. There is no lattice here and no unit cell, and the symmetry is nevertheless exact: all sixty rotations of the icosahedral group carry the set onto itself, on 153 points of its core, measured by applying them rather than assumed from the construction. Seen down this axis the set comes back to itself under a turn of a 10th and no finer turn, measured over every turn up to a twelfth — twice the order of the axis, and the factor of two is a centre of symmetry: this set equals its own negation, which is what a window centred on the origin produces, and that is checked here rather than assumed. A diffraction experiment would record the same 10 whatever: the measured intensity acquires a centre whether or not the structure has one, so the tenfold photograph of 1982 does not by itself distinguish a structure with a centre from one without.

    Six integers, and the lattice that holds them

    A fivefold rotation is not an integer matrix in three dimensions and is one in six. The icosahedral group permutes its own six fivefold axes, so in coordinates along those axes every one of its sixty rotations is a signed permutation — and Z⁶ is a lattice it maps onto itself.

    part 5 · aperiodic
  6. 66 squares and 106 rhombs. The Ammann–Beenker tiling, built by keeping the points of a four-dimensional lattice whose companion image falls inside an octagon and projecting them into the plane. Every tile has the same edge length; the squares and the forty-five degree rhombs are told apart by their diagonals. Nothing was placed — the faces were found among the projected points.

    Eight-fold, with the golden ratio taken out

    The familiar quasicrystals are all built on five: Penrose's rhombs, the Fibonacci chain, the ten-fold pattern Shechtman measured. A method that works only on the golden ratio is a method tuned to its answer — so here is the same construction run on eight, where the irrational is √2 and nothing else changes.

    part 6 · aperiodic
  7. 9 approximants, period 2 to 89. The approximants of the Fibonacci chain: the n-th Fibonacci word taken as a unit cell and repeated. Each is a perfectly ordinary periodic crystal — it has a lattice, a cell and a space group — and each has the composition of the quasicrystal to the accuracy a ratio of Fibonacci numbers can manage, since its long and short tiles are consecutive Fibonacci numbers and their ratio is a convergent of the golden ratio. The last column is where the approximant stops agreeing with the infinite chain letter for letter: always past its own period, because the infinite word begins with every finite Fibonacci word, and never for ever. At order 9 the error in the composition is -3.87e-4, and it falls by a factor of τ² at every step up the sequence.

    The crystal you get by rounding τ off

    Everything aperiodic about a Fibonacci chain comes from one irrational number in the slope of a cut. Replace it by a fraction and the whole construction survives: the same lattice, the same strip, the same rule, and a chain that is periodic — agreeing with the quasicrystal for a length that grows with the denominator.

    part 7 · aperiodic
  8. The allowed energies of the Fibonacci chain, level by level. The set of energies at which a wave neither grows nor decays, for periodic approximants of the Fibonacci chain of 5, 8, 13, 21, 34 and 55 sites. Each row has exactly one band per site, and each band splits into smaller ones at the next level rather than growing. Nothing in the picture converges to an interval: the gaps opened at one level survive at every level after it, and the limit is a Cantor set — closed, containing no interval at all, and of measure zero, which is a theorem of Sütő's rather than something these six rows prove.

    A spectrum that is a Cantor set

    A wave in a periodic chain has bands with gaps between them. A wave in the Fibonacci chain has gaps inside the gaps, at every scale — and the traces that decide where they are obey a recursion with a quantity it cannot change.

    part 8 · aperiodic
  9. One invariant for every invertible chain. The quantity x² + y² + z² − 2xyz − 1, built from the half-traces of the transfer matrices of the two words a substitution produces at each level and of their product, for six substitutions at one energy, logarithmic. For the golden, silver and bronze chains and for the golden rule reversed it is V²/4 = 0.09 at every level — the same number for all four, computed in exact integers. For period-doubling and Thue–Morse it wanders by orders of magnitude from one level to the next.

    One invariant for every chain that can be undone

    The Fibonacci chain's transfer matrices obey a recursion with a quantity it cannot change, and the natural guess is that every quasiperiodic chain has its own. It does not. The conserved quantity is the trace of the commutator of the two tiles' matrices, so every chain a reversible substitution builds from the same two tiles — golden, silver, bronze — conserves the same number, exactly, at every length and every energy. Period-doubling and Thue–Morse, whose rules cannot be undone, conserve nothing.

    part 9 · aperiodic
  10. Tribonacci keeps one number at every length, and its neighbours do not. The size of tr(ABC) − tr(ACB), computed in exact integers on three two-site tiles, at each application of four rules, on a logarithmic scale. Under tribonacci it stays 24 while the traces themselves reach dozens of digits. Under the plastic rule and the rule x³ = x² + 1, both of which can be undone, it wanders and grows. Under a rule that cannot be undone it passes through zero and runs off the scale.

    Three tiles keep a number that asks which way they face

    Two tiles always conserve something: every reversible rule keeps the trace of their commutator. Three letters were expected to conserve nothing, and most rules do conserve nothing. The tribonacci rule keeps exactly one number, the difference between a product of three matrices and the same product reversed. It is zero for any tile that reads the same both ways, so it measures direction rather than difference, and one rule in fifty keeps it, for a reason that can be read off the words.

    part 10 · aperiodic

All series