Twinning — the series
-
A twin is a symmetry the lattice has and the crystal does not
Two orientations of one structure, grown together across a boundary the lattice runs straight through. The operation relating them cannot be a symmetry of the crystal, or there would be nothing to see, and it must be a symmetry of the lattice, or the boundary would be a crack — which leaves exactly a coset, and a short computable list.
-
Twenty-five of the thirty-two can twin, and seven cannot
The number of twin laws available to a crystal is the index of its class in the point group of its lattice, minus one. Doing that arithmetic for all thirty-two classes takes a moment and produces a census with a sharp edge on it — the seven classes that cannot twin this way are exactly the seven that already use everything their lattice has.
-
Quartz has exactly three twin laws, and its lattice is why
Class 32 on a hexagonal lattice has index four, so three twin laws and no more. They turn out to be the three the mineralogists named — Dauphiné, Brazil and the combination of the two — and reading quartz's lattice off its class instead of measuring it would have produced one law where there are three.
-
A merohedral twin moves no spot at all
The twin law is a symmetry of the lattice, so the two individuals have reciprocal lattices lying exactly on top of one another. Nothing splits, nothing appears in a new place, and the only thing that changes is that pairs of intensities which were different have been averaged — which produces a diffraction pattern with a symmetry the crystal does not have and no sign that anything is wrong.
-
The index and the angle a twin misses by
Whether a crystal will twin on a given operation is decided by its lattice, not by its structure. Two numbers decide it: how many lattice nodes there are per node the operation restores, and how far the operation is from being a symmetry at all. Both are computed from integers, and one of them is a fiction that has to be labelled as one.