Theme

The theme: No origin removes it — page 2

An operation's translation splits in two: a part that belongs to the operation, and a part that only records where somebody put the origin. Almost every argument about space groups is about telling them apart, and the first half of the split is the whole difference between a rotation and a screw.

Into space

Ten ways for space to be flat

Thirteen of the two hundred and thirty space groups hold no point still, and folding space along one of them gives a shape with no curvature anywhere. There are ten such shapes, not thirteen, and the difference is the same eleven pairs that separate 230 from 219.

4_1: which index gives which group. The isomorphic subgroups of a 4₍1₎ screw group, index by index. An index sharing a factor with 4 gives nothing — the translation cannot be written on the new cell at all — and the rest give a screw whose index is the old one times the inverse of p modulo the axis order. So the answer alternates: some indices give the group back and others give its mirror image, and which is which is decided by p modulo the order of the axis.

Into space

A bigger cell, and sometimes the mirror

An isomorphic subgroup gives up nothing but scale — the same group again on a coarser lattice. In space the screw axes sharpen the question, and the answer contains a surprise: a cell three times taller holds the group's enantiomorphic partner, so a left-handed screw contains a right-handed one with nothing done to the crystal but a change of description.

pmg: 80 of 80 restricted. The reflections of pmg inside a window of ±4, with the ones whose phase symmetry restricts to two values picked out. Every solid spot has a structure factor that must be real up to a fixed rotation — a sign, in effect — whatever the atoms turn out to be, and the pale ones have a phase symmetry says nothing about. The 4 palest spots carry two incompatible restrictions at once, which leaves them nothing to be but zero. Which spots these are was computed from the operations, before any structure existed.

How it is known

The zones that behave as if there were a centre

The phase problem is usually stated as though symmetry had nothing to say about phases. It is true of most reflections and false of some, and which is decidable from the group alone: where an operation carries a reflection onto its own negative, the phase is confined to two values half a turn apart, computed from that operation's translation.

Into space

A glide sticks two levels together

The translation attached to a glide moves no wavevector at all. It comes back as a phase factor, and at the edge of the zone the factor is minus one — after which the operators of the little group no longer multiply the way the group does, and no rephasing repairs it.

A map from amplitudes alone, 0.59 grid steps out. The density after 150 cycles of flipping, with the atoms that produced the data drawn as rings — moved into the origin and the handedness the solution chose, because a phase set does not fix either and comparing without allowing for them measures the arbitrariness of the description. Every peak of the map is an atom and every atom has a peak. Nothing about the arrangement went into the calculation: the input was a list of amplitudes and a random set of phases.

How it is known

The solver that knows no symmetry

Compute a map from amplitudes and random phases, reverse the sign of everything below a small threshold, transform back and keep the phases. Repeat. The structure appears — and so does its space group, which was never supplied.

two sites in a hexagonal cell: 3 cutoffs, degree 3 to 12. Two atoms per hexagonal cell, at the positions graphite's carbons occupy, read as a net at a ladder of bonding cutoffs. Each row takes the cutoff just past a shell of neighbours and reports the net that results: how many edges it has, the degree of its vertices, whether its cycles generate the whole translation lattice, and the group of its own barycentric placement. The net is not in the coordinates. There is no bond in a list of positions; there is a cutoff, and moving it past a shell gives a different net from the same atoms. A row marked as a supercell is a net whose own translations turn out finer than the cell it was described in — the description was on too large a cell and the machinery says so.

Symmetry at work

A net is a choice of what counts as a bond

A list of atomic positions does not contain a net. It contains distances, and somebody has to decide which of them are bonds — so the net is a fact about the cutoff as much as about the crystal, and moving the cutoff past a shell of neighbours changes the answer.

A mode with no dipole, landing in a phase that may have one. Two marks per row: the first is filled when the mode itself carries a dipole — the displacements, weighted by charge, summing to something other than zero — and the second when the class of the phase it produces permits a polarisation at all. A row with the first empty and the second filled is an improper case: nothing about the transition was about becoming polar, and the phase that results may be polar anyway, so a polarisation appears as a side effect at second order in an order parameter that is about something else. The zone-boundary rows are where these occur; at the zone centre in the plane there are none, because the only two-dimensional order parameters available there are the polarisation itself.

Symmetry at work

The polarisation nobody asked for

A mode whose displacements cancel exactly can still leave a phase whose class permits a polarisation. The crystal then becomes polar as a side effect of a transition that was about something else — and in the plane, at the zone centre, the arithmetic says this cannot happen at all.

Four of the seventeen have a centre, and they are the four with no rotation. For each plane group: the order of its point group, how many of its operations are rotations, the lattice vectors every operation of the point group fixes, and the centre those vectors make. A central element must commute with every translation, which forces its linear part to be the identity — so the centre is a group of translations, and a translation is central exactly when the point group leaves it alone. A rotation leaves nothing alone but zero.

Operations

The four groups with a centre

An element that commutes with everything has to commute with every translation, and that forces its linear part to be the identity. So the centre of a plane group is a group of translations — the ones its point group leaves alone — and a rotation leaves nothing alone but zero. Four of the seventeen have a centre and thirteen have nothing at all.

Four groups whose description count a metric can raise. Every plane group, the number of ways of writing one arrangement down on the lattice the group requires, and the number on the most symmetric lattice it may sit on. Eight groups already occupy the most symmetric lattice available to them and have nowhere to go. Four have a metric that raises the count, by two and in one case by six. The starred rows belong to groups whose normaliser has a free direction, where the quantity is a count of grid points rather than an index and cannot be compared.

Operations

The normaliser is not a function of the group

How many ways there are of writing one structure down is computed from the group and printed in a table beside its name. It is not a property of the group. Draw a p2 pattern on a hexagonal cell rather than an oblique one and the number goes from four to twenty-four, with nothing done to the group at all.

One achiral motif in p4, chiral along one line and achiral along two. The same motif — three points with a mirror and no other symmetry — repeated by p4, the plane group of quarter-turns with no mirror, and placed with its mirror along three different lines of the square lattice. Along the first line the pattern has no operation that reverses orientation: it is chiral, although every piece of it is achiral. Along the second and third the motif's mirror is also a mirror of the whole pattern, and the detected groups are p4m and p4g; the mirror lines of each pattern are drawn. All three verdicts come from detecting the symmetry of the points and agree with whether the motif's mirror normalises p4.

Into space

A hand made of pieces that have none

Quartz is built from tetrahedra that have no handedness, and every quartz crystal is left-handed or right-handed anyway. Put a piece with a mirror into a pattern whose group has none, and the pattern keeps the piece's mirror only if that mirror lies on one of a few lines the group's normaliser draws. Anywhere else, the arrangement has a hand its parts do not.

Seventy-two positions and the sets they fall into. Every plane group with the number of its Wyckoff positions, and the number of sets those positions fall into when the positions a normaliser exchanges are counted once: on the cell the group requires, on the most symmetric cell it may sit on, and under every change of basis carrying the group onto itself. 72 positions become 53 sets on the required cells and 51 on the best ones, and the last column never goes lower. The two groups a special cell changes are pmm and cmm.

Operations

The same site under two names

A structure report puts each atom on a Wyckoff position, and two correct reports of one crystal can name different positions. The positions that can trade places are exactly the ones the normaliser exchanges — and which those are depends on the cell as measured, not only on the group.

Operations

Two mirrors a coset cannot tell apart

Taken modulo its lattice a wallpaper group is finite, and its conjugacy classes are easy to list. But a coset holds every mirror of one direction at once, and the group itself keeps apart mirrors the list merges: pm has two classes of mirror, p2 four classes of half-turn, p3 six classes of rotation. Deciding which is which is Dehn's conjugacy problem, and for these groups it comes down to whether one vector lies in one lattice.

Subgroups, the classes a group sorts them into, and the sets its normaliser does. For every plane group, the number of subgroups of index two and of index three, the number of conjugacy classes those fall into under the group's own operations, and the number of sets they fall into under its Euclidean normaliser. Over the seventeen there are 74 subgroups of index two in 74 classes and 56 sets, and 82 of index three in 36 classes and 32 sets. 9 of the thirty-four rows have fewer sets than classes, which is where the tables' "equivalent" entries come from. Counts of subgroups and of classes agree with an independent count from transitive actions on n points.

Operations

Three of them, and they are equivalent

The subgroup tables print a count and sometimes a word beside it. Three subgroups of one type may be three copies the group itself shuffles, or three the group holds firmly apart and only a change of description exchanges. p3 has three copies of itself at index three, no operation of p3 moves any of them, and one shift by a third of a cell exchanges all three.

Into space

One matrix, four rules

Changing the setting of a structure is one matrix and one origin shift — and the cell, the coordinates, the indices and the operations each obey a different rule under it. Three of the four ways of getting it wrong still leave a closed group of the right order, so closure catches none of them.

A thread's two signs, and the four kinds of operation. Every operation of a rod group carries the axis to itself, so it does two independent things: it keeps or reverses the direction along the thread, by a sign σ, and it keeps or reverses the handedness of the plane across the thread, by the determinant of a 2 × 2 matrix. The determinant in space is the product, so the shaded cells are the proper operations — a turn or screw about the axis, and a half-turn crossing it — and the unshaded ones are the improper. A rod group is chiral when all of its operations sit on the shaded diagonal, and polar along its axis when all of them sit on the top row. The two conditions pick out different diagonals of the same square, which is why neither implies the other.

Into space

A thread's hand is not a choice

A sheet's handedness in space depends on a sign that the plane pattern does not fix, so one plane group carries several sheets and exactly one of them is chiral. A thread has no such freedom: 32 of the 75 rod groups are chiral, they sit over 9 of the 27 axial classes, and which they are is settled before any structure is drawn. Only its direction depends on how the class lies along it.

Two dimensions to be ambiguous in, and one. Why a plane can carry two operations and a line cannot, side by side. Two reflections sharing a plane differ by a translation lying in that plane, and their slides are vectors in the plane — a two-dimensional space, in which a centring vector need not be a multiple of the slide. So the two slides can be genuinely different glides, b against c, and in 1992 the International Tables invented the letter e for the case where neither has a claim. Two rotations sharing an axis differ by a translation along that axis, because anything across it would move the line; their intrinsic parts are vectors along the line, a one-dimensional space in which every lattice vector is a whole multiple of the shortest. So the two differ by a whole number of repeats and are the same screw. The plane has one dimension of freedom left over and the line has none.

Into space

A line carries one screw

A plane can hold two glide operations at once, and in 1992 the International Tables invented a letter for the case where neither has a claim. The same question put to an axis has the opposite answer: across 3,388 axes, not one line carries two — and the reason is that a slide has two dimensions to be ambiguous in and an intrinsic translation has one.

P4₁: the lattices, as an ideal across and a multiple along. Every sublattice the point group of P4₁ carries to itself, indexed by the norm of the ideal it uses across the axis and by the multiple it takes along it. The entry is the space group that sits on it: the parent's own type in one colour, a different type in the other, and a dash where no group with the parent's point group survives at all. A dot marks a lattice that is maximal — one whose step is a single prime, across or along, with nothing between it and the whole. The rows and columns are two divisibility orders and the table is their product, which is the shape the plane's answer predicted.

Into space

An ideal across and a prime along

In the plane a copy of a group inside itself grows by a prime ideal, and the maximal indices are the norms of the primes of a ring. In space with one principal axis there are two directions to grow in, and the question the plane left was whether the two constraints multiply. They do not — and the place they fail is an index the plane calls maximal, because the step in between carries the group's mirror image.

One lattice, two copies of pm. pm on a lattice doubled across its mirrors. The mirrors of the parent are every vertical line; a copy of pm on the doubled lattice has mirrors every other line, and there are two ways to choose which — the solid set or the dashed set. Both are copies of pm with the same lattice and the same point group, and no translation of the parent carries one onto the other, because the translation that would is exactly the one the doubling removed. So a count of invariant lattices is not a count of subgroups, and the gap is visible in the smallest case there is.

Into space

A lattice is not a subgroup

Every count of copies so far has counted lattices, and the International Tables count subgroups. One invariant lattice can carry several copies of a group that nothing in the parent carries onto one another — pm's doubled lattice carries two, with its mirrors on the even lines or the odd ones — and how many is a cohomology computation, a first where the classification of the seventeen used a second.

A screw out of two rotations that have none. Four pairs of located rotations of space, composed, with the result read back as a screw: its angle, and its pitch, which is the part of its translation lying along its own axis. Axes that meet give a rotation and no translation at all, because the point where they meet is fixed by both. Parallel half-turns give a translation. Skew axes give a screw — a motion with a translation in it, out of two motions with none — and the translation is twice the distance between the two axes. Nothing in either factor moves anything along the product's axis, and the product does.

Operations

The axis a product lies on

Two rotations of space about axes that do not meet compose to a screw — a motion with a translation in it, out of two that have none. The translation is twice the distance between the axes and the angle twice the angle between them, and the screw's own axis is not somewhere arbitrary: it lies on the two axes' common perpendicular, at a place the arithmetic gives.

$Tight where there is an axis and vacuous where there is not. The order of a point group annihilates its cohomology, so every intrinsic translation is a multiple of one over that order — the bound every account of the subject quotes. What occurs is one over the exponent of the cohomology, which divides the bound. For a rotation with a direction it fixes the two agree exactly: a four-fold screw does need quarters and a six-fold sixths. For a rotation acting with no fixed direction the exponent is one — the cohomology is trivial and no fraction occurs at all — so the bound is slack by the whole order. The same bound is sharp and useless in the same table.$ The classification

The denominator a group actually needs

The order of a point group annihilates its cohomology, so every intrinsic translation is a multiple of one over that order — a bound every account of the subject quotes. What occurs is one over the exponent, which divides it. The same bound turns out to be attained exactly and to be slack by its whole size, in two rows of one table, and what decides which is whether the rotation fixes a direction.

The sign turns when the cross terms go weak. Every quartet among the strong reflections of a small structure, sorted by the mean of its three cross terms, with the mean cosine of the phase sum in each bin. Where the cross terms are strong the quartet behaves like a triplet and the cosine is near one. Where they are weakest it is -0.698 — negative — and 93 per cent of those quartets have a cosine below nought. The four reflections of the quartet are equally strong in every bin; what changes is three reflections that are not in the sum at all.

How it is known

The relation that can say no

Every phase relation before this one pushes a sum towards zero, so none of them can contradict another — a phase set satisfying all of them badly is still satisfying them in the same direction. A quartet can be estimated at π instead, and it is when its three cross terms are weak, so the information arrives from the reflections nobody would have thought worth measuring.

All themes · All essays