Crystal class — where it appears
Named by 24 essays across 5 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
Thirty-two, and no others
There are exactly thirty-two ways a crystal can be symmetric about a point. Not thirty-two that anybody has catalogued — thirty-two that a finite search produces, from two starting groups, with every step of the reduction counted separately so that no two of them can quietly compensate.
A fingerprint that gave the right answer
The thirty-two classes were merged on a fingerprint — the census of operation types — and the fingerprint returned thirty-two, which is correct. Returning the correct answer is not the same as being entitled to it, and the difference took three wrong constructions to close.
Reading a class off its own axes
A Hermann–Mauguin symbol is not a name that was assigned. It is a report on three directions, read in order, and the whole of it can be derived from the group's matrices — with one genuine convention and one exception, and the exception is orthorhombic.
Five classes grow the same cube
A crystal's shape is the most obvious thing about it and the least informative. Five of the thirty-two classes produce an identical cube, diffraction cannot see an inversion centre and so collapses the thirty-two to eleven, and the measurements that finally separate them are etch pits, optical rotation and a heated crystal attracting ash.
3m1 and 31m are one class
This site has an essay arguing that p3m1 and p31m are genuinely different groups. As point groups the same two objects are one class — and the two subgroups are each normal in the hexagonal holohedry, so nothing in the lattice relates them. What does is a rotation of thirty degrees.
The holohedry is the ceiling
A crystal never has more point symmetry than its lattice. That single containment decides which system a class belongs to, why there are seven systems and not thirty-two, and why a lattice can be more symmetric than the crystal sitting on it — which is the usual case rather than the exception.
Twenty-five of the thirty-two can twin, and seven cannot
The number of twin laws available to a crystal is the index of its class in the point group of its lattice, minus one. Doing that arithmetic for all thirty-two classes takes a moment and produces a census with a sharp edge on it — the seven classes that cannot twin this way are exactly the seven that already use everything their lattice has.
The eleven a diffraction pattern reports
A diffraction experiment cannot tell a crystal from its inverse. So the thirty-two classes collapse to eleven before a single reflection is indexed, and a structure determination begins by answering a different question from the one it was asked.
Twenty-one, thirteen, nine, three
The number of independent elastic constants runs 21, 13, 9, 7, 6, 5, 3 down the crystal systems. Two of those systems carry two numbers rather than one, and which classes take which is not predicted by counting operations — a class with six of them can have more constants than a class with six of them.
Permitted is not present
A symmetry argument says which components of a property may be non-zero. It is routinely read as saying they are — and the gap between the two is where every practical use of this table either works or quietly fails.
Twenty of the twenty-one
Twenty-one crystal classes have no centre of symmetry, and twenty of them permit piezoelectricity. The exception is 432, which has twenty-four operations, no inversion, and a character sum that cancels to nothing — and the reason it fails is not that it has too much symmetry in any ordinary sense.
Each permits what the other forbids
432 and 4̅3m are both cubic, both of order twenty-four, both without a centre. One of them can be piezoelectric and the other can be optically active, and it is not the same one — which is as clean a demonstration as the subject offers that "amount of symmetry" is not a quantity.
A filter of great precision and no predictive power
The whole table in one place — thirty-two classes, six properties, 192 exact integers. What it settles, what it merely permits, and why knowing which of the two is happening at any moment is the entire skill of using it.
One class, two names
Hermann–Mauguin names directions and Schoenflies names a construction, and the two are derived here from the same integer matrices by computations that share no step. Neither can be obtained from the other without going back to the group — which is why a molecule has one kind of symbol and a crystal has both.
Seventy-five ways to be a thread
Eighty layer groups and seventy-five rod groups are usually quoted, both as numbers from the literature. The second is derived here, class by class — and the total alone turned out to be no check at all, because two errors of six groups each give seventy-five as well.
Thirty-two classes, eighteen groups
An inversion centre, a mirror and a two-fold rotation are three of the most different things a crystal can have, and they are the same group of order two. Forget the matrices and keep the multiplication table, and the thirty-two classes collapse to eighteen.
The groups a single hand may sit in
A protein is built from one enantiomer of every amino acid, and a crystal of it contains nothing else. That single fact deletes most of the classification at a stroke: any operation reversing orientation would put the other hand in the same crystal. The criterion is one line of arithmetic, and in the plane the enumeration is complete — five of the seventeen.
The seven groups a field can have
Every group in this collection so far has been finite, because a lattice forbids the alternatives. A uniform field has no lattice: rotate it about its own axis through any angle at all and nothing has changed. There are exactly seven such groups, and they come out of the same closure argument that turns sixteen frieze candidates into seven.
What a crystal keeps in a field
Curie's principle says the symmetry of an effect contains the intersection of the symmetries of its causes. Applied to a crystal in a field that is an intersection of two groups, one of them infinite — and it comes out exactly, class by class, as a subgroup that decides which effects are permitted next.
Twelve of the thirty-two are free
A crystal class leaves some polynomials alone, and the ones it leaves alone form a ring. For twelve of the thirty-two classes that ring is generated by three polynomials with no relation between them, and for the other twenty it is not — and the twelve are exactly the classes generated by their mirror planes. The two verdicts are computed by routes sharing no code, and an inversion centre is not a mirror.
Thirty-two from fourteen matrices
Write the fourteen Bravais lattices as Gram matrices, ask each one which integer matrices preserve it, and take every subgroup of every answer: five hundred and ten of them. Sort those by how many operations of each kind they contain — which a determinant and a trace decide — and thirty-two answers come out. They are the crystal classes, from a construction in which no point group is ever named.
Seventy-three, without a search
The unit a space group is built from is a point group together with the lattice it acts on, and there are seventy-three of them. Getting there looks like it needs conjugacy in GL(3,ℤ), which is a search this collection tried and abandoned. It does not: every finite group of integer matrices carries a canonical larger group that says which lattice it belongs to, and once that is computed the search has nothing left to do.
How many axes there are is a Sylow count
Sylow's theorems say that the subgroups of prime-power order in a finite group are all conjugate and that how many there are is congruent to one modulo the prime. Applied to the thirty-two crystal classes that arithmetic counts axes: the number of Sylow 3-subgroups is the number of equivalent threefold directions, it is four in exactly five classes, and those five are the cubic ones. So cubic has a definition with no geometry in it.
Eleven, eleven and ten
Twenty-one of the thirty-two crystal classes contain a mirror, a centre or a rotoinversion, and not one of them is a new group. Each is a group of rotations with the inversion added, or a group of rotations with half of itself negated — and which half is left alone is the whole of the choice.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Point groupSubgroupHolohedryNeumann principleCharacterTensorAnisotropyConjugacy classFriedel lawEnumerationLaue classAxial vector