Holohedry — where it appears
Named by 46 essays across 7 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
The crystallographic restriction
A repeating pattern may have rotations of order two, three, four or six, and nothing else whatever. The proof is one line of arithmetic, and everything finite in the subject descends from it.
The lattice underneath
Strip a pattern of everything but its repeats and a grid of points is left. That grid is not decoration — it is the object that decides which symmetries the pattern is permitted to have.
Thirty-two, and no others
There are exactly thirty-two ways a crystal can be symmetric about a point. Not thirty-two that anybody has catalogued — thirty-two that a finite search produces, from two starting groups, with every step of the reduction counted separately so that no two of them can quietly compensate.
Five lattices, and no others
A repeating grid can be oblique, rectangular, centred, square or hexagonal. That is the complete list for the plane, and the argument that closes it is a page long.
Forgetting a group in three dimensions
For three phases this site said its machinery was two-dimensional and decided nothing about a space group. That was true, and it was a limit rather than a principle — nothing in the decidability argument mentions the number two.
The restriction in three dimensions
Space is roomier than the plane in every other respect, so the natural expectation is that it permits more rotation orders. It permits exactly the same five, and seeing why is more interesting than the result.
Reading a class off its own axes
A Hermann–Mauguin symbol is not a name that was assigned. It is a report on three directions, read in order, and the whole of it can be derived from the group's matrices — with one genuine convention and one exception, and the exception is orthorhombic.
A twin is a symmetry the lattice has and the crystal does not
Two orientations of one structure, grown together across a boundary the lattice runs straight through. The operation relating them cannot be a symmetry of the crystal, or there would be nothing to see, and it must be a symmetry of the lattice, or the boundary would be a crack — which leaves exactly a coset, and a short computable list.
Centring, counted as a sublattice
Adding the centre of every cell to a lattice produces another lattice, containing the first with index two. Doing it to each of the five in turn shows why the list is five rather than ten, and why only one of the five has a centred description worth keeping.
The holohedry is the ceiling
A crystal never has more point symmetry than its lattice. That single containment decides which system a class belongs to, why there are seven systems and not thirty-two, and why a lattice can be more symmetric than the crystal sitting on it — which is the usual case rather than the exception.
Twenty-five of the thirty-two can twin, and seven cannot
The number of twin laws available to a crystal is the index of its class in the point group of its lattice, minus one. Doing that arithmetic for all thirty-two classes takes a moment and produces a census with a sharp edge on it — the seven classes that cannot twin this way are exactly the seven that already use everything their lattice has.
Twenty-five cells, and fourteen lattices
The usual picture of the fourteen Bravais lattices is a plate of fourteen boxes, which is the answer with the argument removed. The argument is one question asked of twenty-five candidates, and the question has a computable answer.
Forty-eight becomes sixteen
Centre one face of a cube and the four threefold axes along its body diagonals are gone. That sentence is usually offered as a fact to accept; it is a computation whose answer is a number, and the number says which lattice you got instead.
The cell nobody chose
Every unit cell on this site is a convention, and one construction escapes the warning entirely: the region of the plane closer to one lattice point than to any other. It needs no basis, no axes and no rule — and its combinatorics are decided in integers, with the square roots confined to drawing it.
The cell that settles the argument
Two determinations of one compound can report cells that share no number and describe the same lattice. Reduction is the procedure that decides — six integers that depend on the lattice and not on anybody's choice of axes, and that agree exactly when the lattices do.
Thirteen ways to hold a lattice
The crystallographic restriction is about one matrix. A crystal has a whole group of them acting on one lattice at once, and asking how many such groups there are gives thirteen — not the ten of the plane point groups, and not the seventeen of the plane groups.
How many vectors of each length
Counting the lattice points at each distance from the origin turns out to be a question about divisors, and the answer explains something a crystallographer meets every day: why a cubic powder pattern has no line at seven.
Why there is a list at all
Five lattices, seventeen groups, thirty-two classes, two hundred and thirty. Every one of those counts came out of a search that had to know when to stop, and the reason it could stop is a divisibility Minkowski proved in 1887.
The space every lattice lives in
Five lattices in the plane is the number of *kinds*. The number of lattices is a continuum — and it has a shape: one two-dimensional region with two corners, three edges and an interior, where the five kinds turn out to be a region, three arcs and two points rather than five things of one sort.
One crystal, and sixteen coordinate lists
Two structure reports can disagree in every number and describe the same arrangement of atoms, because a space group does not fix its own origin or its own axes. How many genuinely different lists there are is the index of the group in its Euclidean normaliser — a number, computable, and the thing a structural database has to divide out before it can say two entries are the same compound.
The three that stay cubic
A lattice in space has far more sublattices than one in the plane — 651 of index sixteen against 31 — and almost none of them keeps the symmetry it came from. The ones that do exist at indices m³, twice m³ and four times m³, there is exactly one at each, and they are the primitive, face-centred and body-centred cubic lattices, arrived at by asking which sublattices keep a symmetry rather than by enumerating centrings.
How many dislocations a lattice has
A circuit round a defect comes back to the wrong lattice point, and the amount by which it misses is a lattice vector. That much is quantised. The next question has a number for an answer: how many *different* dislocations are there? Two Burgers vectors related by an operation of the point group are one defect seen twice, so the answer is a count of orbits.
The index and the angle a twin misses by
Whether a crystal will twin on a given operation is decided by its lattice, not by its structure. Two numbers decide it: how many lattice nodes there are per node the operation restores, and how far the operation is from being a symmetry at all. Both are computed from integers, and one of them is a fiction that has to be labelled as one.
The symmetry a net was written with
A net has no coordinates, so its symmetry is whatever its best drawing has. This collection measured that by handing the drawing to a detector — and the detector tests a fixed list of matrices, so the answer depended on which pair of translations the voltages had been written against. The honeycomb came back as p6m, or p2, or cmm, or nothing, one net and four answers.
Thirty-two from fourteen matrices
Write the fourteen Bravais lattices as Gram matrices, ask each one which integer matrices preserve it, and take every subgroup of every answer: five hundred and ten of them. Sort those by how many operations of each kind they contain — which a determinant and a trace decide — and thirty-two answers come out. They are the crystal classes, from a construction in which no point group is ever named.
The halving a lattice will not permit
Admit time reversal and a lattice splits into points that leave the moments alone and points that reverse them. The second set is a coset of a subgroup of index two, and every lattice has exactly seven of those, whatever its shape. What differs is how many of the seven the lattice's own symmetry survives — and the face-centred cubic lattice survives none of them.
Seventy-three, without a search
The unit a space group is built from is a point group together with the lattice it acts on, and there are seventy-three of them. Getting there looks like it needs conjugacy in GL(3,ℤ), which is a search this collection tried and abandoned. It does not: every finite group of integer matrices carries a canonical larger group that says which lattice it belongs to, and once that is computed the search has nothing left to do.
The normaliser is not a function of the group
How many ways there are of writing one structure down is computed from the group and printed in a table beside its name. It is not a property of the group. Draw a p2 pattern on a hexagonal cell rather than an oblique one and the number goes from four to twenty-four, with nothing done to the group at all.
A hand made of pieces that have none
Quartz is built from tetrahedra that have no handedness, and every quartz crystal is left-handed or right-handed anyway. Put a piece with a mirror into a pattern whose group has none, and the pattern keeps the piece's mirror only if that mirror lies on one of a few lines the group's normaliser draws. Anywhere else, the arrangement has a hand its parts do not.
The same site under two names
A structure report puts each atom on a Wyckoff position, and two correct reports of one crystal can name different positions. The positions that can trade places are exactly the ones the normaliser exchanges — and which those are depends on the cell as measured, not only on the group.
Going up costs the cell a parameter
The usual asymmetry — finitely many maximal subgroups below, infinitely many minimal supergroups above — is false in both halves for a plane group. Both directions are infinite and equinumerous index by index. The real asymmetry is that 17 of the 31 edges cost the lattice a parameter going up and nothing going down.
The richest group has the poorest arithmetic
A plane group with no symmetry has seven hundred and sixty-two sublattices to grow by; one with a six-fold axis and mirrors has eight. Take the trend to its end in space and a cubic group has six to index forty — one at every cube, one at twice a cube, one at four times a cube, and nothing anywhere else. Every operation of a point group is a condition, and forty-eight conditions leave almost nothing.
Two conditions are not one condition twice
Whether a plane structure has a higher-symmetry supergroup is decided by its measured cell, and the obvious measure — how many standard uncertainties the cell sits from a right angle, or from equal edges — cannot rank the candidates on its own. A square needs two conditions and a rectangle one, so a single distance means different things on each; counted properly, a square can score above the equal-edged lattices that contain it, and walking up the diagram one condition at a time is the reading that keeps the ranking coherent, at a price that has to be paid in its error rate.
Three on a plane, and never four
A reflection plane in a space group carries one operation for each class of lattice vector lying in it, and a face-centred lattice has planes holding two independent centring vectors — enough for four. None of those planes is ever a mirror. The fourteen lattices decide the question without the two hundred and thirty: one, two or three operations on a plane, and never four — with the three on every mirror plane of the rhombohedral lattice, where the Tables' own hexagonal axes put them and the letters have no name for them.
Magnetic reflections land where nuclear ones cannot
An antiferromagnet scatters neutrons into places its chemical structure leaves dark, and never into a place it lights. The reason is one line of algebra: the magnetic pattern is the nuclear pattern shifted by half a reciprocal-lattice vector. Each of a lattice's seven halvings is one such shift, and how many of them its symmetry keeps decides how many kinds of domain the magnet must form.
Only two and three can centre a lattice
The centring letters P, A, B, C, I, F and R are usually a list brought to the Bravais lattices. They can be derived instead: a centring is a subspace of the lattice reduced modulo a prime, and a centring that keeps a crystal system's symmetry is a subspace its holohedry leaves invariant. Enumerating every one for the seven holohedries and the primes up to seven gives exactly the fourteen, with new lattices only at two and three. The reason is the crystallographic restriction, one step removed: every holohedry has an order made of twos and threes.
The body-centred hypercube is the checkerboard lattice
In three dimensions the centring letters come out as the subspaces a holohedry keeps modulo a prime, and only two and three make new lattices. In four dimensions the same census, run on the six lattices whose symmetry groups are maximal, finds a prime that the three-dimensional argument never could: five centres A₄ into its dual. It also finds that the most familiar centring does not survive the extra dimension. The body-centred hypercubic lattice is not a centred hypercube at all: its body centre is exactly as far away as an edge, and it is D₄, with three times the symmetry.
A whole star needs a cubic box
A periodic box for a cubic crystal holds only the wavevectors its own lattice allows, and a box chosen to hold one wavevector usually holds one arm of its star and not the others. One arm of the face centre X fits in two cells; all three need eight. One arm of a third along an axis fits in three; the whole star needs twenty-seven. The smallest box that holds a whole star always keeps the cube's full symmetry, so a calculation either pays for the cube or reports a symmetry its box imposed.
A five-fold lattice has one free number
In four dimensions a lattice can have a five-fold rotation, and A₄ and its dual both do. Every other lattice with one turns out to be the same ring, the integers of the fifth roots of unity, with a single number deciding its shape. Folded onto an interval, the number runs from A₄* at one end to A₄ at the other, and every lattice strictly between has twenty symmetries. Centring by fifths does not make a new lattice. It reflects the interval end to end, exchanging A₄ with A₄* and pairing every other lattice with a partner, and no lattice sits at the middle to be its own.
A cubic cell has fourteen chances to fail
In the plane, deciding whether a measured cell is square meant two steps up a short diagram, and dividing the error rate between them fixed the test. In space, a primitive cubic cell sits on ten strata joined by fourteen steps on ten different paths, and a walk that tests every step at five per cent calls more than a quarter of true cubic cells something less. Dividing the level by the steps of one path is not enough and dividing it by all fourteen is too much. Measured directly, the right level is two-thirds of a per cent a step, and calibrated that way the walk notices a tetragonal distortion more often than the single test it replaces.
A seven-fold lattice lives on a folded torus
In six dimensions a lattice can have a seven-fold rotation, and every one that does is the integers of the seventh roots of unity with three weights on it. Up to scale the weights live on a hexagonal torus that a Galois symmetry folds by a third-turn, and the fold has three fixed points: A₆*, A₆, and a third lattice that packs better than either. Centring by sevenths is no longer a reflection, as fifths was in four dimensions. It moves every lattice a third of the way along the torus and carries the three special ones round in a cycle.
The densest eleven-fold lattice is not its own dual
Every ten-dimensional lattice with an eleven-fold rotation is one ring with five weights, and its shapes form a four-dimensional torus folded by a Galois rotation of order five. The seven-fold essay predicted five special lattices, the powers of 1 − ζ, cycled by centring, and all of that holds. What does not carry over is its best result. In six dimensions the densest seven-fold lattice was the one duality fixes. In ten, duality fixes (1 − ζ)³, and the densest is (1 − ζ)², whose dual is (1 − ζ)⁴.
Thirteen-fold, and nothing is its own dual
Every twelve-dimensional lattice with a thirteen-fold rotation is one ring with six weights, and its shapes form a five-dimensional torus folded six ways. The fold has six fixed points, the powers of 1 − ζ, and duality fixes none of them, as in four dimensions and unlike six and ten: it pairs them off. The eleven-fold essay asked whether a longer cycle would let a higher power take over as the densest. It does not. (1 − ζ)² is the densest member at seven, at eleven and at thirteen, whatever duality does.
The centring survives the limit
Stretch a body-centred tetragonal lattice until its axes are equal and it becomes body-centred cubic; stretch it further and it becomes face-centred cubic. No stretching of a primitive tetragonal lattice reaches either. Which of the fourteen lattices can be deformed into which is decided by the subgroups of each lattice's own group, and the answer keeps track of centring in a way the familiar chain of crystal systems does not.
One cell reaches every Wyckoff set
In the plane, every identification the affine normaliser makes between two positions is made by an isometry of some cell, and the essay that found this warned against carrying it into space, where changes of basis can mix axes without limit. It carries. The 1,731 positions of the 230 groups were found from stabilisers and the sets from normalisers, and on one cell for each type the two partitions agree. Past the monoclinic system that is a one-line average. Below it, the infinite normaliser turns out to have nothing left to join.
No cell joins the seven halves
Every identification the normaliser makes between Wyckoff positions is made by an isometry of some cell, and it was natural to expect the same of subgroups. It nearly is. Across all 219 types and their 1,813 subgroups of index two, one cell does everything the normaliser does, except in the two triclinic groups. P1 has seven ways to be halved, and its normaliser makes them all one. No cell can, because seven is the number the crystallographic restriction forbids.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Bravais latticeCentringMetric tensorSubgroupNormaliserSublatticeLattice automorphismLattice typePoint groupCrystal classCrystallographic restrictionGram matrix