Crystallography & Symmetry
patterns derived from their groups
Concept

Crystal form — where it appears

The complete set of faces a crystal class requires to appear together, being the orbit of one face under that class. Whether a form encloses a volume, and so whether a crystal could be bounded by it alone, is decided by the class without any lengths or angles entering the calculation.

Named by 7 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

{111} in class m3̅m. The form {111} of crystal class m3̅m: 8 faces, being the orbit of one face under the 48 operations of the class, with a stabiliser of order 6. 4 poles lie in the upper hemisphere or in the plane of the page and are drawn filled; the other 4 lie below and are drawn open at the same positions, which is the stereographic convention and the reason only the upper ones carry their indices. The form is closed: the faces enclose a volume, so a crystal can be bounded by this form alone.

A form is an orbit, and whether it closes is an integer question

Name one face of a crystal and its class names the rest. That set is a form, it is an orbit in exactly the sense this site has used since its first essay, and whether it encloses a volume — whether a crystal could be bounded by it alone — is decided without any lengths or angles entering the calculation anywhere.

applied · Forms {100} offered to 5 classes: one form between them — the shape names none of the 5. The same face, {100}, handed to 5 crystal classes — m3̅m, m3̅, 432, 4̅3m, 23 — with the orbit each one returns drawn as a stereogram. Filled marks are poles in the upper hemisphere and open ones their partners below. The face counts are 6, 6, 6, 6, 6, taking 1 distinct value; the sets of faces take 1, which is the number that matters, since two classes can return the same count and different faces. Here every class returns the identical set, so a crystal bounded by this form alone has said nothing about which of them grew it.

Five classes grow the same cube

A crystal's shape is the most obvious thing about it and the least informative. Five of the thirty-two classes produce an identical cube, diffraction cannot see an inversion centre and so collapses the thirty-two to eleven, and the measurements that finally separate them are etch pits, optical rotation and a heated crystal attracting ash.

applied · Forms Three lattices at 2 forms each: 6, 14, 12 faces. The shape each cubic lattice predicts, built as the solid bounded by its top 2 forms, with each face's distance from the centre inversely proportional to its interplanar spacing. The three lattices have the same metric and the same list of indices; every difference between these solids comes from which reflections are systematically absent. Pm-3m leads on {100} and comes out with 6 faces; Fm-3m leads on {111} and comes out with 14 faces; Im-3m leads on {110} and comes out with 12 faces. Taking more than the leading form matters only where the extinction correction has moved something: in a cubic metric a form's planes are placed at a distance proportional to the root of the sum of the squares of its indices, which is exactly where the corresponding corner of the cube already is, so an uncorrected second form arrives tangent and cuts nothing off.

Which faces a crystal shows

Rock salt grows as cubes, fluorite as octahedra, garnet as dodecahedra. All three have cubic lattices and the same list of possible faces, and what separates them is which reflections are systematically absent — a rule about diffraction predicting a shape a mineralogist can hold.

applied · Growth Equilibrium and growth are different shapes. Two predictions for the habit of the same cubic crystal, computed through the same intersection of half-spaces. The equilibrium shape puts each face at a distance proportional to its surface energy, which is Wulff's construction; the growth shape puts it at a distance proportional to its growth rate, taken here from this site's own spacing rule. They differ — the equilibrium shape carries {111}, {110}, {100} and the growth shape {100} — and the difference is between two rules rather than between two pieces of code. A crystal on a bench has grown; a crystal annealed long enough has relaxed; the two look different and neither picture is wrong.

The fast faces are the ones that vanish

A crystal has two predicted shapes and they are not the same. One minimises surface energy and is what a crystal settles into; the other is what growth leaves behind, and in it a face that grows quickly grows itself out of existence.

applied · Growth [001]: 8 of 24 faces. The 24 faces of the form {210} of a cubic crystal, stereographically projected, with one zone marked. The great circle is the set of directions perpendicular to the axis [001]; the 8 faces on it are the zone, and each is on it because the integer sum hu + kv + lw is exactly zero. No length and no angle enters that test. Faces of the lower hemisphere are drawn faintly.

A zone is a vanishing dot product

Look at a crystal and the obvious thing about it is that the faces run in bands — sets whose edges are all parallel. A face belongs to such a band exactly when three integers multiplied by three others sum to zero. No length enters, no angle enters, and that is why every index on a nineteenth-century mineral specimen is still the index used now.

applied · Forms A hundred and thirteen orbit types, merged into shapes. The three counts, and what stands between them. 113 is the number of kinds of form this site publishes: one for every stabiliser a face can have, in every class. Allowing a stratum to change shape along its own family raises it to 164. Merging entries that are the same solid with the same symmetry, wherever they occur, brings it down to 48 — 30 that enclose a volume and 18 that do not, which is the count every mineralogy text prints, with the dome and the sphenoid kept apart rather than merged. The last line is the warning: throwing away the symmetry of the solid and keeping only its combinatorial type leaves 35, because a rhombic dipyramid, a tetragonal dipyramid and an octahedron are one and the same arrangement of eight triangles.

A hundred and thirteen orbits, and forty-eight shapes

This collection reports 113 kinds of crystal form and every mineralogy text reports 47. That difference was explained here in a paragraph and never computed, which means nobody had checked it. Computing it needs a definition of *shape* a program can decide, and the definition turns out to be the interesting part.

applied · Forms Cube, octahedron, rhombic dodecahedron — from connectivity alone. Every form of index two or less, classified by how many chains lie inside it: two or more and the face is flat, exactly one and it is stepped, none and it is kinked. The number beside each flat form is how many chains it contains, which is the rule's own tie-break — a face with three chains is flatter than one with two. Nothing about interplanar spacing enters, and the three structures are told apart by their bonds.

Which faces are flat

Bravais ranks a crystal's faces by how far apart their planes lie. Hartman and Perdok classify them by how many uninterrupted chains of bonds run inside them, which uses no spacing at all — and on the three cubic structures the two rules put the same face first every time. Then the second rule's power turns out to live entirely in where the chain list is cut off.

applied · Growth

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Crystal habitMiller indicesMorphologyBfdhInterplanar spacingClosed formFace poleMeasurementSystematic absenceBroken-bondCentringClose packing

All concepts