Crystallography & Symmetry
patterns derived from their groups
Concept

Crystal habit — where it appears

What one specimen happens to look like, which forms it shows and how far each has grown, rather than which forms it may show. Predicting a habit needs a rule about growth rates on top of the symmetry, and the commonest such rule ranks faces by their corrected spacings.

Named by 6 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

The angles between the faces of {102̅}. The form {102̅} of class 3̅m in section, with each face labelled by its indices. Its 6 faces make 15 pairs and only 3 distinct angles, the smallest being 76.43°. Every value is computed from the cell's metric — the one calculation in this family that is not integer arithmetic, because an angle is a real number and a lattice does not constrain it.

Why a crystal face carries small whole numbers

A crystal face is flat because it lies on a plane of lattice points, and its orientation is therefore named by three integers rather than by two angles. That the integers exist is a theorem about lattices; that they are usually smaller than four is a separate claim about growth, and the two are routinely run together.

applied · Forms Two habits of {101̅}, one set of angles. The same 12 faces of class 6/mmm, grown to different distances from the centre. The outline changes completely and not one interfacial angle moves, because a face's orientation is set by the lattice and its extent by how fast it grew. That is Steno's law, and it is the reason a goniometer measures something about the substance rather than about the specimen.

The angles belong to the substance, the shape to the specimen

Two crystals of the same mineral can look nothing like each other and still have exactly the same angles between corresponding faces. That is the oldest quantitative law in the subject, and what it measures turns out to be the shape of the unit cell — which means a brass instrument from 1809 was reading lattice parameters a century before anyone knew there were any.

applied · Forms {100} offered to 5 classes: one form between them — the shape names none of the 5. The same face, {100}, handed to 5 crystal classes — m3̅m, m3̅, 432, 4̅3m, 23 — with the orbit each one returns drawn as a stereogram. Filled marks are poles in the upper hemisphere and open ones their partners below. The face counts are 6, 6, 6, 6, 6, taking 1 distinct value; the sets of faces take 1, which is the number that matters, since two classes can return the same count and different faces. Here every class returns the identical set, so a crystal bounded by this form alone has said nothing about which of them grew it.

Five classes grow the same cube

A crystal's shape is the most obvious thing about it and the least informative. Five of the thirty-two classes produce an identical cube, diffraction cannot see an inversion centre and so collapses the thirty-two to eleven, and the measurements that finally separate them are etch pits, optical rotation and a heated crystal attracting ash.

applied · Forms Three lattices at 2 forms each: 6, 14, 12 faces. The shape each cubic lattice predicts, built as the solid bounded by its top 2 forms, with each face's distance from the centre inversely proportional to its interplanar spacing. The three lattices have the same metric and the same list of indices; every difference between these solids comes from which reflections are systematically absent. Pm-3m leads on {100} and comes out with 6 faces; Fm-3m leads on {111} and comes out with 14 faces; Im-3m leads on {110} and comes out with 12 faces. Taking more than the leading form matters only where the extinction correction has moved something: in a cubic metric a form's planes are placed at a distance proportional to the root of the sum of the squares of its indices, which is exactly where the corresponding corner of the cube already is, so an uncorrected second form arrives tangent and cuts nothing off.

Which faces a crystal shows

Rock salt grows as cubes, fluorite as octahedra, garnet as dodecahedra. All three have cubic lattices and the same list of possible faces, and what separates them is which reflections are systematically absent — a rule about diffraction predicting a shape a mineralogist can hold.

applied · Growth Equilibrium and growth are different shapes. Two predictions for the habit of the same cubic crystal, computed through the same intersection of half-spaces. The equilibrium shape puts each face at a distance proportional to its surface energy, which is Wulff's construction; the growth shape puts it at a distance proportional to its growth rate, taken here from this site's own spacing rule. They differ — the equilibrium shape carries {111}, {110}, {100} and the growth shape {100} — and the difference is between two rules rather than between two pieces of code. A crystal on a bench has grown; a crystal annealed long enough has relaxed; the two look different and neither picture is wrong.

The fast faces are the ones that vanish

A crystal has two predicted shapes and they are not the same. One minimises surface energy and is what a crystal settles into; the other is what growth leaves behind, and in it a face that grows quickly grows itself out of existence.

applied · Growth Cube, octahedron, rhombic dodecahedron — from connectivity alone. Every form of index two or less, classified by how many chains lie inside it: two or more and the face is flat, exactly one and it is stepped, none and it is kinked. The number beside each flat form is how many chains it contains, which is the rule's own tie-break — a face with three chains is flatter than one with two. Nothing about interplanar spacing enters, and the three structures are told apart by their bonds.

Which faces are flat

Bravais ranks a crystal's faces by how far apart their planes lie. Hartman and Perdok classify them by how many uninterrupted chains of bonds run inside them, which uses no spacing at all — and on the three cubic structures the two rules put the same face first every time. Then the second rule's power turns out to live entirely in where the chain list is cut off.

applied · Growth

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Crystal formMiller indicesBfdhInterplanar spacingMorphologySystematic absenceAxial ratioBroken-bondCentringCleavageClose packingCoordination number

All concepts