Crystallographic restriction — where it appears
Named by 29 essays across 7 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
The crystallographic restriction
A repeating pattern may have rotations of order two, three, four or six, and nothing else whatever. The proof is one line of arithmetic, and everything finite in the subject descends from it.
The restriction in three dimensions
Space is roomier than the plane in every other respect, so the natural expectation is that it permits more rotation orders. It permits exactly the same five, and seeing why is more interesting than the result.
What a trace decides
Ten kinds of operation, and two integers tell them apart. The determinant and the trace name a symmetry operation completely — which is why the classification can be run on integer matrices in a lattice basis and never once ask what angle anything turns through.
Before the lattice has a say
Every finite group of motions of the plane is a Cₙ or a Dₙ, and every finite group of rotations of space is one of five families. Both lists come out of counting rather than out of crystallography — and then the crystallographic restriction deletes almost all of them, leaving eleven.
Eleven ways to turn while climbing
Five rotation orders survive the crystallographic restriction, and each of them admits a screw for every whole number of cells its turns can amount to. That is a sum with four terms, and it is why there are eleven screw axes rather than some other number.
Icosahedral symmetry
Sixty rotations, six fivefold axes, and no lattice in three dimensions that can hold any of them. It is the point group a crystal is forbidden, and the one the first quasicrystal turned out to have.
Two hundred and forty-seven descents, or two hundred and twelve
How many distinct ways can a crystal lose symmetry? Counting parent-and-child pairs up to conjugacy in the parent gives 247. The standard enumeration in the ferroics literature gives 212, and the operation that merges the extra thirty-five turns out to be a rotation through forty-five degrees — which no lattice may have, and which no integer matrix in a lattice basis can therefore express.
The most of an icosahedron a crystal can keep
C₆₀ sits in crystals and virus capsids sit in crystals, and neither of them stops being icosahedral. What a lattice can fix is a subgroup — and the largest crystallographic subgroup of the sixty rotations has order twelve, at index five. The five are Kepler's five cubes.
Why there is a list at all
Five lattices, seventeen groups, thirty-two classes, two hundred and thirty. Every one of those counts came out of a search that had to know when to stop, and the reason it could stop is a divisibility Minkowski proved in 1887.
Eleven duals, one tile each
Swap the vertices of a uniform tiling for its tiles and the eleven come back as eleven tilings by a single repeated shape. Three of those shapes are pentagons — which is worth pausing over on a site whose other essays prove that five-fold symmetry cannot exist.
Five solids from one inequality
Five families of rotation group in space, five regular solids, three regular tilings of the plane and an endless supply of hyperbolic ones — all of it is 1/p + 1/q compared with a half, read at its three signs.
Twelve pentagons, and no way round them
The crystallographic restriction forbids a five-fold face in a flat repeating net. Curve the net into a closed cage and the same three lines of arithmetic require exactly twelve of them — at any size, with the hexagon count free. What a lattice forbids, closing up compels.
Eight-fold, with the golden ratio taken out
Every quasicrystal on this site has been built on five: Penrose's rhombs, the Fibonacci chain, the ten-fold pattern Shechtman measured. A method that works only on the golden ratio is a method tuned to its answer — so here is the same construction run on eight, where the irrational is √2 and nothing else changes.
Five copies, and the gap they leave
Gold, silver and silicon grow particles with a five-fold axis down the middle, out of a lattice that forbids one. Nothing is violated: five tetrahedral pieces of ordinary face-centred metal, each the mirror image of its neighbour, come to three hundred and fifty-two and a half degrees rather than three hundred and sixty — and the seven degrees left over have to go somewhere.
What a molecule gives up to sit in a crystal
A molecule brings its own symmetry. A crystal offers sites with symmetries of their own, and the two have to be compatible — the site's symmetry must be a subgroup of the molecule's. So a molecule may always keep more than its site offers, and a molecule with a five-fold axis may sit only where the crystal offers nothing at all.
The restriction, with no lattice assumed
The proof that only two-, three-, four- and six-fold rotations are possible is usually stated about a lattice, and every step of it turns out to need no lengths at all. A periodic graph has the same theorem, proved the same way — and a graph may have a five-fold symmetry the plane cannot receive.
The degrees that name the restriction
The reflection group with an n-fold rotation has invariants of degrees 2 and n — for every n, with no lattice anywhere in the argument. Which of those groups a crystal may have is then the only question left, and its answer is the crystallographic restriction arriving from a direction nobody points it from.
How large a degeneracy may be
Symmetry can force two things to have the same value, and in a crystal it can force three. It can never force five, and the reason is a sum of squares — the same kind of arithmetic that forbids a five-fold axis, arriving at a question about levels rather than about rotations.
As many heptagons as pentagons
A trivalent net on a sphere must have exactly twelve pentagons. The same three lines of arithmetic on a torus give zero — which does not forbid pentagons, it makes them pay: every pentagon has to be balanced by a heptagon, and the counts are otherwise free. One rotated bond in a wrapped honeycomb makes two of each and changes nothing else.
Four root systems, and the same four rotations
Two mirrors meeting at an angle generate a group. Ask that the group be finite and that a certain pairing between the mirrors come out a whole number, and the angle has only four possible values — from which the rotations that survive are of order two, three, four and six. The crystallographic restriction arrives with no lattice anywhere in the argument.
What a thread scatters
A helix with ten subunits in a turn is not a screw axis a crystal may have, and nothing about its diffraction pattern is lawless. The pattern lies on layer lines, and on each one only certain angular orders may contribute — a selection rule as hard as any extinction condition. The lowest permitted order rises by one per layer line, a Bessel function of order n does nothing until its argument is about n, and the maxima therefore lie on two straight lines through the origin.
The twelve belongs to the vertex
Twelve pentagons is read as a fact about closing a surface. It is not: it is a fact about three edges meeting at a point. Let four edges meet instead and the sphere charges eight triangles; let five meet and it charges twenty; let six meet and it cannot be paid at all.
Seven friezes round a cylinder
A point group with one principal axis belongs to one of seven infinite families, and there are seven frieze groups. They are the same seven. Draw a frieze on a strip, roll the strip into a cylinder, and every translation becomes a turn about the axis and every glide a rotoreflection.
What forces a lattice
Every enumeration here starts from a lattice of translations, and the lattice is usually taken as given. It need not be. A group of motions that is discrete, and leaves no point far from an orbit, has to contain one — in the plane by an argument four lines long, each line a picture, and in space by an inequality whose threshold turns out to be the six-fold rotation.
The tube has a screw no lattice allows
Roll a honeycomb along one of its lattice vectors and the tube turns and climbs with a screw of order 14, 98 or 794 — orders the flat sheet could never have. The rolling keeps the sheet's translations and spends them on turns, and it keeps the sheet's mirrors only along two directions, which is why almost every carbon nanotube comes in two hands.
Most sheets roll into a tube that never repeats
Rolling the honeycomb along a lattice vector always gives a tube with a repeat, and that is a property of the honeycomb rather than of rolling. Over the seventeen plane groups, 567 of 1,008 rolling directions give a tube with no translation along its axis at all — and every direction of an oblique pattern is one of them.
A rolled sheet is never one of a pair
Rolled up along every lattice vector that gives a crystallographic tube, the seventeen plane groups reach fifty-four of the seventy-five rod groups: every achiral one and eleven of the chiral. Not one of the sixteen screws that come in left- and right-handed pairs is among them, and the reason is a single fact about how far a rolled lattice can climb.
Closing the plane from two centres
Put two rotation centres down and close under composition: the result is a plane group or is not discrete, and nothing in between. What decides it is the least common multiple of the two orders, because two rotations generate rotations and the angles add — so the crystallographic restriction arrives as a condition on a closure rather than as one on a lattice.
Two patterns laid over one another
Compose two plane groups rather than two operations. The group generated by both is one of the seventeen or is not discrete at all, with nothing between — and it takes two conditions, one on the rotation orders and one on the turn between the lattices. The turns that work have rational cosines, which by a theorem of Niven's means none of them is a whole number of degrees.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
EnumerationPoint groupScrew axisChiralityDualityFinite groupIcosahedral symmetryPlane groupRod groupClosureDihedral groupDiscreteness