Finite group — where it appears
Named by 10 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
Before the lattice has a say
Every finite group of motions of the plane is a Cₙ or a Dₙ, and every finite group of rotations of space is one of five families. Both lists come out of counting rather than out of crystallography — and then the crystallographic restriction deletes almost all of them, leaving eleven.
Why there is a list at all
Five lattices, seventeen groups, thirty-two classes, two hundred and thirty. Every one of those counts came out of a search that had to know when to stop, and the reason it could stop is a divisibility Minkowski proved in 1887.
Reduction modulo three
A finite group of integer matrices survives being reduced modulo three: no two of its operations collide. That single fact proves the classification finite without computing any bound — and modulo two it is false, refuted by the inversion centre.
Five solids from one inequality
Five families of rotation group in space, five regular solids, three regular tilings of the plane and an endless supply of hyperbolic ones — all of it is 1/p + 1/q compared with a half, read at its three signs.
The average that makes it finite
Two arguments every classification leans on are usually assumed rather than made: that a finite group of motions fixes a point, and that a finite group of integer matrices preserves a metric. They are the same trick — average over the group — and the trick fails exactly where it should.
Crystallography in a box
A calculation over a crystal is not performed on a crystal. It is performed on a finite block with its edges glued, and the block has a symmetry group of its own — finite, complete in one direction and missing something decisive in the other.
Eleven, eleven and ten
Twenty-one of the thirty-two crystal classes contain a mirror, a centre or a rotoinversion, and not one of them is a new group. Each is a group of rotations with the inversion added, or a group of rotations with half of itself negated — and which half is left alone is the whole of the choice.
What forces a lattice
Every enumeration here starts from a lattice of translations, and the lattice is usually taken as given. It need not be. A group of motions that is discrete, and leaves no point far from an orbit, has to contain one — in the plane by an argument four lines long, each line a picture, and in space by an inequality whose threshold turns out to be the six-fold rotation.
Which groups a crystal could have
Bieberbach's theorem is a statement about a group acting: discrete, no point far from an orbit. Zassenhaus turned it round into a statement a group can satisfy on its own — a maximal abelian normal subgroup, free of finite rank, of finite index — and each of those three clauses is kept out of redundancy by a group that fails it and nothing else.
Straight lines, and no distances
Every finiteness met so far rests on the motions preserving a metric, because the trick that produces one is an average and an average needs something to average over. Keep the straight lines and drop the distances, and Bieberbach's first theorem is false in the plane — by an example two lines long, whose group is the plane's own translations and whose translations have rank one.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Crystallographic restrictionFixed pointOrbitDiscretenessEnumerationHomomorphismInteger matrixLattice translationMinkowski boundTranslation groupArithmetic crystal classCommutator