Crystallography & Symmetry
patterns derived from their groups
Concept

Group — where it appears

A set of operations closed under composition, containing an identity and an inverse for each. Symmetries cannot be chosen independently: do two of them in succession and the result is forced to be a third, which is why there is no eighteenth wallpaper.

Named by 6 essays across 4 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

A rotation. The motif in the first colour, its images under a single rotation in the second, and the symmetry element marked where the operation itself says it lies.

What a symmetry actually is

Not a property of a shape but a motion that leaves it alone. Once symmetry is a verb rather than an adjective, everything else in the subject follows — including why there can only ever be seventeen wallpapers.

operations · What symmetry is Doing one after another. Two symmetries of a pattern, and the one that doing both lands on. The third picture is not a new operation drawn to fit — it is the composition, and it was already in the group.

Why it is a group and not a list

The symmetries of a pattern cannot be chosen independently. Do two of them in succession and the result is forced to be a third, which is why there is no eighteenth wallpaper for anybody to invent.

operations · What symmetry is The region, and its copies. Words in S and T up to length 4, each carrying the region somewhere else. The copies do not overlap and they do not leave gaps: the upper half-plane is tiled by them, one copy per change of basis. That is the whole content of the claim that reduction picks a canonical basis — every basis of every lattice is in exactly one copy, and reduction is the walk back to the shaded one.

Two moves reach every basis

A lattice has infinitely many bases and reduction picks one. Why it can is a fact about a group with two generators and two relations — and the fundamental region tiles the plane with its own copies, one per basis, which is what makes the walk home finite.

lattices · Moduli One local configuration, and a number of structures that doubles. How many kinds of adjacent pair a close-packed stack has, how many kinds of triple, and how many stackings of each period there are. The first column never moves: every pair of layers is congruent to every other, at every period, which is what an order-disorder family is. The last two agree with 2ⁿ + 2(−1)ⁿ, which is the chromatic polynomial of a ring of n layers at three colours, because a stacking of period n is exactly a proper three-colouring of that ring. The gap between the first column and the last is the whole subject.

A stack with no space group

Every pair of layers in a close-packed stack is congruent to every other pair, and the number of stacks doubles with every layer added. A family whose local configuration is completely determined and whose global structure is not determined at all has no single symmetry group — what it has is a set of operations that compose only when their ends match, which is a groupoid.

applied · Packing Four of the seventeen have a centre, and they are the four with no rotation. For each plane group: the order of its point group, how many of its operations are rotations, the lattice vectors every operation of the point group fixes, and the centre those vectors make. A central element must commute with every translation, which forces its linear part to be the identity — so the centre is a group of translations, and a translation is central exactly when the point group leaves it alone. A rotation leaves nothing alone but zero.

The four groups with a centre

An element that commutes with everything has to commute with every translation, and that forces its linear part to be the identity. So the centre of a plane group is a group of translations — the ones its point group leaves alone — and a rotation leaves nothing alone but zero. Four of the seventeen have a centre and thirteen have nothing at all.

operations · Composition 12 of the thirty-two classes have a free invariant ring. Every crystal class with its order, the number of its operations that are reflections, whether its ring of invariant polynomials is free, and the degrees of the generators when it is. A reflection here is an operation of determinant minus one whose fixed set is a plane; an inversion centre has determinant minus one and fixes only the origin and is not one. The classes with a free ring are exactly the classes generated by their reflections, which is Chevalley's theorem checked rather than quoted.

Twelve of the thirty-two are free

A crystal class leaves some polynomials alone, and the ones it leaves alone form a ring. For twelve of the thirty-two classes that ring is generated by three polynomials with no relation between them, and for the other twenty it is not — and the twelve are exactly the classes generated by their mirror planes. The two verdicts are computed by routes sharing no code, and an inversion centre is not a mirror.

point-groups · Invariants

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Point groupSymmetry operationGeneratorsInvarianceTranslation groupAbelianisationBasis reductionChange of basisCharacterClose packingClosureComposition

All concepts