Translation group — where it appears
Named by 12 essays across 5 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
The lattice underneath
Strip a pattern of everything but its repeats and a grid of points is left. That grid is not decoration — it is the object that decides which symmetries the pattern is permitted to have.
Why sixteen become seven
Four extra operations give sixteen combinations and seven groups. The nine that vanish are not cases anybody forgot — each one comes back from the closure holding something it was never given, and one of them changes the lattice underneath it.
The domains a lost translation makes, which nothing optical can see
An ordering transition can leave the crystal class untouched and take away translations instead. The domains that result have the same orientation, the same shape and the same optical properties as each other, and where two of them meet the ordering is simply out of step — a boundary with no change of direction across it and no way to find it except by looking at the ordering itself.
How few operations make a pattern
A plane group is infinite, and a handful of its operations is enough to rebuild all of it. How small a handful is a question with a floor from the abelianisation and a ceiling from an exhaustive search, and for fourteen of the seventeen the two numbers meet.
Discrete, or dense, and nothing between
Every count in this collection rests on a hypothesis nobody states, because it is built into the word lattice: the translations of a pattern form a discrete subgroup of the plane. Drop it and the counts do not become larger — they stop existing, because the object stops being a lattice. A subgroup of the plane is one of five things, and only two of them are lattices.
Every net with two vertices, counted
The one-vertex census could not contain the honeycomb, because the honeycomb has two vertices in its cell. Adding the second one closes a family at two nets, removes the floor of p2 entirely, makes a third of the members undrawable, and forces the census to refuse a kind of description the first one never met: an honest quotient graph written on twice the cell it needs.
The quotient each normal subgroup leaves
Two hundred and eighty-one subgroups of index four across the seventeen plane groups, and ninety-seven of them normal. Which ones, and what is left when they are divided out, needs no enumeration at all: below order six every group is abelian, so a normal subgroup of small index is a subgroup of the abelianisation and its quotient is decided by a product of greatest common divisors.
A stack with no space group
Every pair of layers in a close-packed stack is congruent to every other pair, and the number of stacks doubles with every layer added. A family whose local configuration is completely determined and whose global structure is not determined at all has no single symmetry group — what it has is a set of operations that compose only when their ends match, which is a groupoid.
The four groups with a centre
An element that commutes with everything has to commute with every translation, and that forces its linear part to be the identity. So the centre of a plane group is a group of translations — the ones its point group leaves alone — and a rotation leaves nothing alone but zero. Four of the seventeen have a centre and thirteen have nothing at all.
What forces a lattice
Every enumeration here starts from a lattice of translations, and the lattice is usually taken as given. It need not be. A group of motions that is discrete, and leaves no point far from an orbit, has to contain one — in the plane by an argument four lines long, each line a picture, and in space by an inequality whose threshold turns out to be the six-fold rotation.
Which groups a crystal could have
Bieberbach's theorem is a statement about a group acting: discrete, no point far from an orbit. Zassenhaus turned it round into a statement a group can satisfy on its own — a maximal abelian normal subgroup, free of finite rank, of finite index — and each of those three clauses is kept out of redundancy by a group that fails it and nothing else.
Straight lines, and no distances
Every finiteness met so far rests on the motions preserving a metric, because the trick that produces one is an average and an average needs something to average over. Keep the straight lines and drop the distances, and Bieberbach's first theorem is false in the plane — by an example two lines long, whose group is the plane's own translations and whose translations have rank one.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
DiscretenessFixed pointLattice translationAbelianisationCosetFinite groupNormal subgroupClassificationClosureCommutatorConjugationContinued fraction