Crystallography & Symmetry
patterns derived from their groups
Concept

Incommensurate — where it appears

Having two periods whose ratio is not a ratio of whole numbers, so that no cell of any size contains the structure. Indexing such a pattern takes two integers per reflection instead of one, and the extra spots' intensities are a check the arithmetic can be made to pass.

Named by 5 essays across 3 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

A chain modulated at q = 0.211. The lower row is the lattice: 34 sites, evenly spaced. The upper row is the structure: the same sites displaced by a wave of amplitude 0.12 of a spacing and wavevector 0.211, drawn through them. Because 0.211 is not a ratio of small whole numbers, no cell of any size holds the structure — the displacement pattern never repeats — and yet the atoms are nowhere near random: each one is exactly where a single sine wave says it should be. That is what an incommensurately modulated crystal is, and its diffraction pattern is sharp.

The satellites that need a second integer

A crystal whose atoms are displaced by a wave of the wrong wavelength has no unit cell at all, and diffracts to sharp spots anyway. Indexing them takes two integers per reflection instead of one — and the intensities of the extra spots are Bessel functions, which is a check the arithmetic can be made to pass.

aperiodic · Modulation 13 of one on 12 of the other. Two rows of atoms whose spacings are in the ratio 1.042. Every 12 cells of the substrate come to within 3.97 per cent of 13 cells of the film, so the two are nearly in register at those points and out of register between them. There is no exact coincidence anywhere, and there cannot be: exact coincidence needs the ratio to be rational, and no measured ratio is.

Two different lattices never coincide, and the question becomes how nearly

Grow one crystal on another and their spacings are in a ratio that no measurement ever makes rational, so exact coincidence is unavailable in principle. What is left is the best rational approximation inside a tolerable repeat — a quantity that jumps rather than drifts as the ratio changes, and whose acceptability is decided by elasticity rather than by arithmetic.

applied · Interfaces two chains, periods 1 and 1.62. Two interpenetrating chains of atoms with periods 1 and 1.62, whose ratio is irrational, so no length is a whole number of both. Each chain is displaced from its own lattice by a wave with the other's period — the short ticks show each atom's displacement from where an unmodulated chain would put it — which is what makes this one crystal rather than two side by side. Nothing here is a unit cell: any length chosen contains a whole number of one chain's atoms and a fractional number of the other's.

Two lattices, one crystal, and no cell at all

A modulated crystal has a lattice and a wave running through it. A composite has neither host nor guest: two interpenetrating substructures with periods that share no common multiple, each modulating the other. Every reflection needs an index from both, and the unit cell a diffractometer reports belongs to whichever half scattered harder.

aperiodic · Modulation Whether a rolled sheet ever comes back round. Three plane lattices, each with the same rolling vector C = 3a₁ + a₂ drawn from the origin and the line through the origin perpendicular to it. A translation of the rolled pattern straight up the tube, with no turn, is a lattice vector on that line. The square lattice has one, marked T, and the tube repeats every 10 turns. The general rectangular lattice has none in this direction — only along its cell edges — and the general oblique lattice has none in any direction at all, so its rolled pattern climbs forever without returning to the same angle.

Most sheets roll into a tube that never repeats

Rolling the honeycomb along a lattice vector always gives a tube with a repeat, and that is a property of the honeycomb rather than of rolling. Over the seventeen plane groups, 567 of 1,008 rolling directions give a tube with no translation along its axis at all — and every direction of an oblique pattern is one of them.

restriction · Finite groups Every rational holds a window, and there is nothing in between. The ground state density of a chain of particles with a convex repulsion, against the chemical potential that sets how many of them there are. Every density with denominator up to 24 is a flat step of positive width — 177 of them — and the steps with the simplest fractions are the widest: a half takes 19 per cent of the whole range on its own. The risers between them are not smooth stretches; they are where the densities with larger denominators sit, and a finer computation fills them with more steps. What is left after every rational has taken its window is the irrational densities, which are the genuinely incommensurate ground states and have no width at all.

Every fraction holds a window

Three essays here name the devil's staircase and none computes one. A chain of particles with any convex repulsion has a ground state at every rational density holding an interval of chemical potential to itself — 709 of them computed, the widest taking 19% of the axis and the narrowest two parts in a million million — and the incommensurate densities are what is left over.

aperiodic · Modulation

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

EnumerationIndexingLong-range orderModulationQuasiperiodicBessel functionChiralityCoincidence site latticeCommensurateComposite crystalContinued fractionConvexity

All concepts