Reciprocal lattice — where it appears
Named by 21 essays across 6 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
Why a crystal face carries small whole numbers
A crystal face is flat because it lies on a plane of lattice points, and its orientation is therefore named by three integers rather than by two angles. That the integers exist is a theorem about lattices; that they are usually smaller than four is a separate claim about growth, and the two are routinely run together.
The reciprocal lattice
Nobody has seen a space group. Crystals are read from where they scatter, and where they scatter is a second lattice in which long has become short and short has become long.
The dual lattice, as a construction
The reciprocal lattice is usually introduced as a formula and then used as a fact. Building it instead — one point per family of lattice rows, at the inverse of the spacing — makes every property it has obvious rather than memorable.
The reflections that are not there
A screw axis and a glide plane leave no mark on the intensity of any reflection. What they do is delete some, exactly, for every possible arrangement of atoms — and the pattern of deletions is computed here from the sum a crystallographer writes down, rather than read from a table.
The cell nobody chose
Every unit cell on this site is a convention, and one construction escapes the warning entirely: the region of the plane closer to one lattice point than to any other. It needs no basis, no axes and no rule — and its combinatorics are decided in integers, with the square roots confined to drawing it.
The reflections a superlattice adds
Centring a lattice makes reflections vanish. Ordering two kinds of atom onto a sublattice makes new ones appear, exactly n − 1 of them per parent cell, and their intensity is a difference rather than a sum — which is why an ordered alloy of two neighbouring elements can be invisible to X-rays and obvious to neutrons.
The zones above the first
The second Brillouin zone is a scattering of disconnected fragments in a different part of reciprocal space from the first, and it has exactly the same area. So does the third, and the seventh. The reason is that each of them is the first zone, cut up and moved.
How many reflections there are
The reciprocal lattice is infinite and a measurement is not. A wavelength cuts a sphere out of it, the number of points inside is the sphere's volume times the cell's, and symmetry then removes all but a fraction — though never quite the fraction a division would give.
The absence that fills itself in
A systematic absence is the strongest evidence this subject has: a whole zone of reflections cancelling exactly, for reasons of symmetry rather than of arithmetic accident. The exactness belongs to a model — that the beam scatters once. A beam that has already been diffracted can be diffracted again, and the two events together land where the group said nothing could.
The star of a wavevector
A plane group acts on the plane, and this collection has spent two hundred essays watching it. It also acts on the reciprocal lattice, where the action is different in one decisive way: the translations move no wavevector at all, and come back instead as a phase.
A bigger cell, a smaller zone
Ordering two kinds of atom onto a sublattice adds reflections to the diffraction pattern and opens a gap in the levels. It is one fact told twice: the same Fourier component of the potential, at the same wavevector, doing the same thing.
Every reflection, several times over
A diffraction experiment does not measure each reflection once. Symmetry relates a reflection to the others of its orbit, and those are the same reflection seen from another direction — so a hundred thousand measurements may contain twelve thousand reflections, each observed eight times.
A cell from a bag of spots
A single-crystal experiment returns a list of directions with no labels on them. Recovering the cell is recovering the lattice those directions generate, and the whole of it is take differences, reduce, read the answer. What no quantity of data settles is whether the lattice found is the true one or a sublattice of it.
What one turn of the crystal reaches
Every reflection inside the limiting sphere is measurable by some orientation. A crystal on a spindle has one axis, and a region around it never reaches the Ewald sphere at all — however patiently the crystal is turned.
Superspace groups in the plane
A modulated crystal has no space group, and in a space of one more dimension it has one. Counting them in the plane is the seventeen's own extension arithmetic with a third coordinate on which the point group acts by a sign — and the sign has to be plus or minus exactly, which kills the three-fold, four-fold and six-fold classes before a single extension is counted.
A beat is not a period
Lay one lattice on another and turn it: the coarse pattern that appears has a spacing anyone can compute, a over twice the sine of half the twist, and it exists at every angle whatever. Whether the superposition actually repeats is a different question with a different answer — countably many angles say yes, and at most of those the true cell is larger than the beat by a definite factor. On a square net it always is.
Every alias is a supercell
A cell that explains every line of a powder pattern is not a near miss and not a coincidence: its reciprocal grid contains the true one, which means its own cell is a superlattice of the true cell. So the ambiguity of indexing is the arithmetic of superlattices, and it can be counted — two cells with one unknown, sixteen with two, sixty-two with three, all of them accounting for the same twenty lines exactly.
What a thread scatters
A helix with ten subunits in a turn is not a screw axis a crystal may have, and nothing about its diffraction pattern is lawless. The pattern lies on layer lines, and on each one only certain angular orders may contribute — a selection rule as hard as any extinction condition. The lowest permitted order rises by one per layer line, a Bessel function of order n does nothing until its argument is about n, and the maxima therefore lie on two straight lines through the origin.
Every plane lattice is its own dual
The dual of a lattice has the inverse Gram matrix, and in two dimensions the inverse is the adjugate over the determinant — which is what one particular change of basis does to a Gram. So a plane lattice's dual is the lattice itself, turned through a right angle and scaled, for every lattice with no exception. In three dimensions it is a condition, and the face-centred and body-centred cubic lattices are duals of each other rather than of themselves.
The sum that turns a lattice into its dual
Put a Gaussian on every point of a lattice and add them up. The answer equals the same sum over the dual lattice with the width inverted and the covolume divided out — exactly, to the last bit a double carries, on lattices with no symmetry in them. The identity is free and the reason to have it is that the two sides do not cost the same: at one end of the range the direct sum needs forty thousand terms and the dual sum needs a hundred and twenty-five.
How much of the hat is a crystal
Put a scatterer on every corner of a patch of hats and the diffraction pattern repeats exactly, because every corner sits on a lattice. Inside each repeat the strongest reflections are those of an ordinary crystal with partly filled sites, and by Parseval's identity they carry sixty-three per cent of what the pattern holds. The aperiodicity the hat is famous for lives in the remaining third, in reflections a hundred times weaker.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Structure factorSystematic absenceBrillouin zoneCentringDual latticeGram matrixLaue classSublatticeBragg's lawGlide planeIndexingInterplanar spacing