Reflection group — where it appears
Named by 6 essays across 3 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
The degrees that name the restriction
The reflection group with an n-fold rotation has invariants of degrees 2 and n — for every n, with no lattice anywhere in the argument. Which of those groups a crystal may have is then the only question left, and its answer is the crystallographic restriction arriving from a direction nobody points it from.
The groups whose invariants are free
Six of the ten plane classes have an invariant ring generated by two polynomials with no relation between them, and the six are exactly those generated by their own reflections. The degrees of those generators multiply to the order of the group, and their excess counts the reflections.
Three invariants and one relation
Four of the ten plane classes need three invariants where two variables can only support two, so exactly one polynomial identity ties them together. The identity is not recognised or recalled: it is the kernel of a linear map, computed and then checked at lattice points where every term is an integer.
What the twenty lack is a product of mirrors
Twelve crystal classes have invariant rings generated by three independent polynomials, and they are the twelve generated by their own mirrors. The other twenty were left as the classes whose counts need a correction. The correction has a simple shape. Each of the twenty sits inside one of the twelve, at index two or four, and its invariants are the larger class's invariants times one or three extra polynomials. Each extra polynomial is a product of the mirror planes the smaller class lacks. For the rotations of the cube it is a single polynomial of degree nine, the product of all nine mirrors of the full cubic class.
Every magnetic class counts its properties by mirrors
The invariants of every crystal class turned out to be products of mirrors of a reflection class, times that reflection class's own free invariants. A magnetic class asks for polynomials that some of its operations negate, which is harder in principle. It is not harder in fact: all fifty-eight black-and-white classes, for a time-odd quantity that is polar and for one that is axial, are counted by mirror products — provided the reflection class contains the whole class and not only its unprimed part, which for thirty of them it does not.
The square net draws eleven groups
The Cayley graph of a wallpaper group is a periodic net. Asked the other way, the question is which nets are Cayley graphs, and of what. A net is one exactly when some group of its symmetries carries every vertex to every other and fixes none. All eleven uniform nets pass. The square net is the Cayley graph of eleven of the seventeen groups, the kagome net of exactly one, and between them the eleven nets use all seventeen.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Invariant ringMolien seriesInvariant polynomialAlgebraic independenceChevalley theoremHypersurfaceInvariant degreesSyzygyArchimedean tilingCayley graphCharacterChirality