Accidental symmetry — where it appears
Named by 11 essays across 5 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
Forgetting a group in three dimensions
For three phases this site said its machinery was two-dimensional and decided nothing about a space group. That was true, and it was a limit rather than a principle — nothing in the decidability argument mentions the number two.
The motif must be a comma
A dot is too symmetric to illustrate most wallpaper groups. Its orbit acquires mirrors nobody asked for, and the resulting figure is quietly of a different group from the one in its caption.
The symmetry diffraction adds
A diffraction pattern is always more symmetric than the crystal that made it. The extra symmetry is not a mistake in the experiment and no care removes it — it is a property of what a detector records, and it collapses the seventeen groups onto six.
Near-symmetry, and the tolerance that is not here
Every claim on this site is decided by integer arithmetic, so no threshold is ever chosen. Measured coordinates do not arrive that way, and the moment a tolerance is introduced the answer stops being a fact about the structure and becomes a fact about the threshold.
The symmetry of an average
A diffraction experiment measures an average over some 10²⁰ unit cells, and the average of several orientations is more symmetric than any of them. So a refined structure can carry symmetry that no molecule in the crystal has — including, in the worst case, a centre of inversion in a crystal built entirely of one hand.
The groups ornament actually uses
Seventeen exist and decoration does not use them evenly. Which are common is an empirical question that published surveys answer differently, and part of the reason is a hazard this site can measure exactly.
The Alhambra question
Textbooks say the Alhambra contains all seventeen wallpaper groups. Careful analysts of the same building have counted eleven, thirteen, fourteen and seventeen — and the disagreement is not about the mathematics but about what counts as an instance.
How much pattern is enough
Every claim here about a pattern's group is a claim about an infinite pattern. A reader sees a patch. Measuring what a finite window can decide gives a number — about one cell's radius — and two opposite ways of being wrong on the way there.
Eleven tilings, five groups
Hand each of the eleven uniform tilings to a detector that has never heard of tilings and ask what its symmetry is. Six of them answer p6m. Twelve of the seventeen wallpaper groups never appear at all — and the coordinates the question has to be asked in are not fractions.
The placement nobody chose
A net has no coordinates, so drawing one means inventing them. There is exactly one way to invent them that involves no choice: put every vertex at the average of its neighbours. The drawing that results has the largest symmetry group the net admits, and this site's own detector finds it.
A hand made of pieces that have none
Quartz is built from tetrahedra that have no handedness, and every quartz crystal is left-handed or right-handed anyway. Put a piece with a mirror into a pattern whose group has none, and the pattern keeps the piece's mirror only if that mirror lies on one of a few lines the group's normaliser draws. Anywhere else, the arrangement has a hand its parts do not.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Round tripOrbitPattern analysisStabiliserThe AlhambraChiralityDecidabilityDetectionGroup frequencyHolohedryOrnamentSite symmetry