Orbit — where it appears
Named by 31 essays across 8 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
What a symmetry actually is
Not a property of a shape but a motion that leaves it alone. Once symmetry is a verb rather than an adjective, everything else in the subject follows — including why there can only ever be seventeen wallpapers.
A form is an orbit, and whether it closes is an integer question
Name one face of a crystal and its class names the rest. That set is a form, it is an orbit in exactly the sense this site has used since its first essay, and whether it encloses a volume — whether a crystal could be bounded by it alone — is decided without any lengths or angles entering the calculation anywhere.
The orbit is the pattern
A wallpaper is not designed and then found to have symmetry. It is the set of places a group sends a single mark, and once that is taken literally the pattern can be grown, checked, and caught out.
The points a group treats differently
Almost every point of a cell has an orbit as long as the group. The exceptions are the points some operation leaves alone, and they are where atoms sit, where a structure's formula comes from, and where a careless motif destroys the group it was meant to illustrate.
The fundamental domain
The smallest piece of a pattern from which the group rebuilds the rest. Drawing one is easy and drawing one correctly is not, because a region with a gap or an overlap looks exactly like a region without.
One part in however many, and why it is never quite that
A crystal's contents are the asymmetric unit repeated by the group. The unit's volume is the cell's divided by the order of the group — except that it is always a little more, and the excess is exactly the special positions counted whole.
The symmetry of an average
A diffraction experiment measures an average over some 10²⁰ unit cells, and the average of several orientations is more symmetric than any of them. So a refined structure can carry symmetry that no molecule in the crystal has — including, in the worst case, a centre of inversion in a crystal built entirely of one hand.
The same pattern, described twice
Two coordinate lists for one structure can disagree in every number and describe exactly the same arrangement, because a group does not fix its own origin. The operations that may be applied to a description without changing what it describes are its normaliser, and they can be found by looking at pictures rather than at matrices.
Counting what a group cannot tell apart
Sixty-five thousand ways of putting two species on sixteen sites; eight hundred and five structures. The difference between those numbers is not a division, because the symmetric arrangements have short orbits — and the count that gets it right is an average of fixed points.
Seventy-four colourings, forty-six groups
This site counts the two-colourings of the seventeen and gets seventy-four. The literature says there are forty-six two-colour wallpaper groups. Both numbers are right, and the gap between them is a disagreement about when two coloured patterns are the same pattern.
The most of an icosahedron a crystal can keep
C₆₀ sits in crystals and virus capsids sit in crystals, and neither of them stops being icosahedral. What a lattice can fix is a subgroup — and the largest crystallographic subgroup of the sixty rotations has order twelve, at index five. The five are Kepler's five cubes.
How many vectors of each length
Counting the lattice points at each distance from the origin turns out to be a question about divisors, and the answer explains something a crystallographer meets every day: why a cubic powder pattern has no line at seven.
Every colour count at once
Eight hundred and five structures is the answer for two species on sixteen sites. For three species it is a different sum, and for four another. Averaging cycle counts instead of fixed-point counts turns the answer into a polynomial — and refining the same average says how many structures there are at each composition, which is the number anybody actually needs.
Eleven tilings, five groups
Hand each of the eleven uniform tilings to a detector that has never heard of tilings and ask what its symmetry is. Six of them answer p6m. Twelve of the seventeen wallpaper groups never appear at all — and the coordinates the question has to be asked in are not fractions.
Five solids from one inequality
Five families of rotation group in space, five regular solids, three regular tilings of the plane and an endless supply of hyperbolic ones — all of it is 1/p + 1/q compared with a half, read at its three signs.
The average that makes it finite
Two arguments every classification leans on are usually assumed rather than made: that a finite group of motions fixes a point, and that a finite group of integer matrices preserves a metric. They are the same trick — average over the group — and the trick fails exactly where it should.
An orbit is what the invariants cannot tell apart
Two points of the plane lie in the same orbit of a group exactly when every invariant polynomial takes the same value on both. One direction of that is a definition; the other is a theorem, and it is checked here by comparing every pair of points in a window both ways.
One shape, two kinds of tile
A tiling by copies of a single shape looks as though it must be homogeneous — every tile is congruent to every other, so what could distinguish them? The symmetry group can. There are shapes that tile the plane and admit no tiling whose group carries any tile to any other, and the smallest of them has eight cells.
How many dislocations a lattice has
A circuit round a defect comes back to the wrong lattice point, and the amount by which it misses is a lattice vector. That much is quantised. The next question has a number for an answer: how many *different* dislocations are there? Two Burgers vectors related by an operation of the point group are one defect seen twice, so the answer is a count of orbits.
The shell that splits into kinds
The neighbours of an atom carry a space of functions as large as the shell, and the group does not treat that space as one thing. It splits into pieces of a few kinds, in whole numbers, and the count is the cheapest character in the subject: how many neighbours each operation leaves where they are.
Every reflection, several times over
A diffraction experiment does not measure each reflection once. Symmetry relates a reflection to the others of its orbit, and those are the same reflection seen from another direction — so a hundred thousand measurements may contain twelve thousand reflections, each observed eight times.
The argument that closes eleven
Twenty-one vertex species satisfy the angle equation; a parity argument kills ten before anything is drawn, and the eleven survivors are all built. Asking the same question of tilings with two kinds of vertex, the parity argument evaporates — it constrains a walk in a graph one species decides, and two species decide the union of two graphs, which need not be bipartite. What is left is a search, and a search cannot close a count.
What a half-turn does to three colours
Ten of the seventeen plane groups have no three-colouring, because a half-turn cannot permute three colours cyclically — that is the first rung of this ladder and it is true. Drop the word cyclically and the answer changes completely: a half-turn permutes three colours perfectly well by swapping two and fixing one, and only the three four-fold groups refuse three colours at all.
The table that decides every action
Burnside's lemma counts orbits and stops there — two completely different actions with the same orbit count are indistinguishable to it. The object that settles the whole question is a square table whose entries count fixed cosets: lower triangular because a subgroup fixes no coset of anything smaller, positive on the diagonal because it fixes its own, and therefore invertible. Inverting it turns a list of fixed-point counts back into the orbits themselves.
The occupancy does not name the disorder
A molecule disordered on a special position takes a number of orientations fixed by a group index, and its occupancy is the reciprocal. Many different disorders share one occupancy — eleven at a single kind of tetragonal site — and what separates them is which of the site's operations the molecule keeps, which the averaged structure records and the occupancy does not.
A hand made of pieces that have none
Quartz is built from tetrahedra that have no handedness, and every quartz crystal is left-handed or right-handed anyway. Put a piece with a mirror into a pattern whose group has none, and the pattern keeps the piece's mirror only if that mirror lies on one of a few lines the group's normaliser draws. Anywhere else, the arrangement has a hand its parts do not.
The same site under two names
A structure report puts each atom on a Wyckoff position, and two correct reports of one crystal can name different positions. The positions that can trade places are exactly the ones the normaliser exchanges — and which those are depends on the cell as measured, not only on the group.
The molecule size that hides a disorder
Two disorder models with the same occupancy leave averaged structures that differ only in a handful of partial atoms. The difference is 20% in structure factors for a ten-atom molecule and 3% for a sixty-atom one — so the data choose between the models for a small molecule and stop choosing for a large one, and seven pairs are identical at any size.
Symmetry does not rescue a Patterson
Every homometric pair found so far sits on a bare ring with no operations imposed, and a real crystal sits in a space group. Impose one and the ambiguity does not go away: 12 of the 13 groups searched still have pairs, and at six atoms the hexagonal groups are indistinguishable two to three times as often as the general position.
Which groups a crystal could have
Bieberbach's theorem is a statement about a group acting: discrete, no point far from an orbit. Zassenhaus turned it round into a statement a group can satisfy on its own — a maximal abelian normal subgroup, free of finite rank, of finite index — and each of those three clauses is kept out of redundancy by a group that fails it and nothing else.
Straight lines, and no distances
Every finiteness met so far rests on the motions preserving a metric, because the trick that produces one is an average and an average needs something to average over. Keep the straight lines and drop the distances, and Bieberbach's first theorem is false in the plane — by an example two lines long, whose group is the plane's own translations and whose translations have rank one.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
StabiliserSpecial positionMultiplicitySite symmetryEnumerationConjugationFinite groupFixed pointHolohedryNormaliserPlane groupSubgroup