Crystallography & Symmetry
patterns derived from their groups
Concept

Bravais lattice — where it appears

One of the fourteen lattice types of three-dimensional space, classified by the symmetry a lattice's metric admits. The usual plate of fourteen boxes is the answer with the argument removed; the argument is one question asked of twenty-five candidates.

Named by 14 essays across 4 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

P2₁/c, in the two diagrams the Tables print. Space group P2₁/c, number 14, projected down c on a primitive monoclinic cell. The symmetry elements drawn: 2 2₁ screw axes, 2 glide planes, 4 inversion centres. 4 general positions, the orbit of one point, each labelled with its height along c and marked with a comma where the operation that produced it reversed handedness.

The step a flat surface has no room for

Seventeen becomes two hundred and thirty, and the factor of thirteen is not a matter of having more directions to work in. It comes from an operation the plane cannot hold — a translation that no choice of origin will remove.

space-groups · Space groups The five plane lattices. Every periodic pattern in the plane repeats on one of five lattices. The classification is by which point symmetries the lattice itself admits, and the five are exhaustive — a sixth would need a rotation order no lattice can carry.

Five lattices, and no others

A repeating grid can be oblique, rectangular, centred, square or hexagonal. That is the complete list for the plane, and the argument that closes it is a page long.

lattices · Lattice The 48 point symmetries of a cubic lattice. Every operation that maps a cubic lattice onto itself, built as the integer matrices preserving that system's metric: 48 of them, of which 24 are proper rotations and 24 reverse handedness. The orders occurring among the rotations are 1, 2, 3, 4 — the same list the plane gives, so the crystallographic restriction does not change in three dimensions, and there is no six anywhere. The 13 rotation axes are counted from the rotations they carry rather than drawn from memory, and every rotation but the identity is checked to belong to exactly one of them.

The restriction in three dimensions

Space is roomier than the plane in every other respect, so the natural expectation is that it permits more rotation orders. It permits exactly the same five, and seeing why is more interesting than the result.

restriction · Restriction The fourteen Bravais lattices. All fourteen lattices: triclinic P, with 2 symmetries; monoclinic P, with 4 symmetries; monoclinic C, with 4 symmetries; orthorhombic P, with 8 symmetries; orthorhombic C, with 8 symmetries; orthorhombic I, with 8 symmetries; orthorhombic F, with 8 symmetries; tetragonal P, with 16 symmetries; tetragonal I, with 16 symmetries; rhombohedral P, with 12 symmetries; hexagonal P, with 24 symmetries; cubic P, with 48 symmetries; cubic I, with 48 symmetries; cubic F, with 48 symmetries. The corner points are the conventional cell; the points in the second colour are the centring translations, drawn at every position inside the cell rather than one per face. The cell shapes are the picture's, chosen so no two systems look alike; only the angles a system is defined by mean anything.

Twenty-five cells, and fourteen lattices

The usual picture of the fourteen Bravais lattices is a plate of fourteen boxes, which is the answer with the argument removed. The argument is one question asked of twenty-five candidates, and the question has a computable answer.

lattices · The fourteen Bravais lattices Six integers that do not depend on the description. The same monoclinic lattice written in 4 different bases, each obtained from the last by an integer matrix of determinant one, and each reduced by Niggli's algorithm. Every one of them gives the same six integers — the squared lengths and twice the dot products of the reduced basis. That is what makes the reduced form a fingerprint of the lattice: two cells with no number in common are the same lattice exactly when their reduced forms agree, and the comparison has no tolerance in it.

The cell that settles the argument

Two determinations of one compound can report cells that share no number and describe the same lattice. Reduction is the procedure that decides — six integers that depend on the lattice and not on anybody's choice of axes, and that agree exactly when the lattices do.

lattices · Lattice Five shapes, and a lattice in space has no other. The five combinatorial types a Wigner–Seitz cell can have in three dimensions — cube, hexagonal prism, rhombic dodecahedron, elongated dodecahedron, truncated octahedron — each drawn from a lattice that produces it. Fedorov proved in 1885 that there are no others, and that fourteen faces is the most any of them has, which is Minkowski's bound of 2(2ⁿ − 1) in three dimensions. Each solid here is cut out by the perpendicular bisectors of nearby lattice vectors and its volume checked against the primitive cell's, which is what catches a face that failed to appear.

Five parallelohedra, and no others

The cell that needs no basis and no convention has, in three dimensions, exactly five shapes. The fourteen Bravais lattices produce all five between them — and which one a lattice gives is not decided by which of the fourteen it is.

lattices · Wigner–Seitz cells Sublattices of index n, in space. How many sublattices a three-dimensional lattice has at each index, beside the plane's answer, with the Hermite enumeration and the coefficient of ζ(s)ζ(s−1)ζ(s−2) in separate columns. The two are computed by routines sharing no code, and a row where they disagreed would be a failure rather than a result. The last column counts the ones that survive every operation of the cubic group, and it is almost always empty.

The three that stay cubic

A lattice in space has far more sublattices than one in the plane — 651 of index sixteen against 31 — and almost none of them keeps the symmetry it came from. The ones that do exist at indices m³, twice m³ and four times m³, there is exactly one at each, and they are the primitive, face-centred and body-centred cubic lattices, arrived at by asking which sublattices keep a symmetry rather than by enumerating centrings.

lattices · Sublattices One change of basis turns a Gram into its own adjugate. For each Gram matrix: the matrix after the basis change by a right-angle rotation, and the adjugate. They are equal, always — and the adjugate is the determinant times the inverse, which is the dual lattice's Gram. So the dual is the same lattice on a rotated basis, scaled by one over the determinant. Five rows are the named plane lattice types and the rest have entries picked at random, because the claim is an identity in integers and not a property of the five.

Every plane lattice is its own dual

The dual of a lattice has the inverse Gram matrix, and in two dimensions the inverse is the adjugate over the determinant — which is what one particular change of basis does to a Gram. So a plane lattice's dual is the lattice itself, turned through a right angle and scaled, for every lattice with no exception. In three dimensions it is a condition, and the face-centred and body-centred cubic lattices are duals of each other rather than of themselves.

lattices · Lattice Perfection is a rank, and most lattices do not reach it. For each lattice, the rank of the matrices vvᵀ built from its shortest vectors, against the dimension of the space of symmetric matrices those live in. Reaching it means the shortest vectors pin the form down completely: no deformation keeps every one of them at its length. Falling short means there is a direction left to move in, and the lattice is not a local maximum of density.

One perfect form in space

Which lattice packs spheres most densely is a question about a maximum over a continuum, and Voronoi turned it into a rank calculation and a sign check. A lattice is a local maximum exactly when its shortest vectors pin its shape down completely and its inverse can be written over them with positive coefficients. Searching every reduced integer form of minimum two finds one such lattice in the plane and one in space.

lattices · Packing How many similar sublattices the cubic lattice has at each scale. Every integer matrix satisfying MᵀM = α²I, counted up to the lattice's own point group by marking orbits rather than dividing. The even scales are drawn apart because they are the ones that give nothing new: a factor of two in the scale never produces a shape the smaller scale did not already have.

The shapes a lattice in space can thin to

In the plane, which indices admit a sublattice of the same shape is a question about which integers a quadratic form represents, and Fermat answered it. In space the question collapses: taking determinants shows the index is always a perfect cube, so there is nothing to represent. What is left is how many there are at each cube — and for a hexagonal lattice, whether there are any at all depends on one number.

lattices · Sublattices Thirty-two classes, from fourteen Gram matrices. The five hundred and ten subgroups sorted by how many operations of each kind they contain — a determinant and a trace decide which of the ten kinds a matrix is. Thirty-two answers come out, and they are the thirty-two crystal classes: matched against the construction elsewhere in this collection by signature rather than by name, since nothing here names a point group.

Thirty-two from fourteen matrices

Write the fourteen Bravais lattices as Gram matrices, ask each one which integer matrices preserve it, and take every subgroup of every answer: five hundred and ten of them. Sort those by how many operations of each kind they contain — which a determinant and a trace decide — and thirty-two answers come out. They are the crystal classes, from a construction in which no point group is ever named.

point-groups · The fourteen Bravais lattices Twenty-two halvings the fourteen lattices permit. Every lattice has exactly seven subgroups of index two, whatever its shape. The third column is how many of the seven the lattice's own group carries onto themselves, and the fourth is how many of those survive as distinct types once a change of basis within the type is allowed to identify them. The running total ends at twenty-two, which with the fourteen grey lattices is the thirty-six magnetic Bravais lattices — and the row that ends at zero is the face-centred cubic lattice.

The halving a lattice will not permit

Admit time reversal and a lattice splits into points that leave the moments alone and points that reverse them. The second set is a coset of a subgroup of index two, and every lattice has exactly seven of those, whatever its shape. What differs is how many of the seven the lattice's own symmetry survives — and the face-centred cubic lattice survives none of them.

lattices · Magnetic Seventy-three arithmetic classes, from fourteen groups. Every subgroup of every lattice's own group, split by whether the subgroup's own Bravais group is that lattice's. The ones that are not belong to a lower lattice and are counted there, which is what stops the same class being counted twice. The running total ends at seventy-three, and no conjugacy in GL(3, ℤ) was ever decided.

Seventy-three, without a search

The unit a space group is built from is a point group together with the lattice it acts on, and there are seventy-three of them. Getting there looks like it needs conjugacy in GL(3,ℤ), which is a search this collection tried and abandoned. It does not: every finite group of integer matrices carries a canonical larger group that says which lattice it belongs to, and once that is computed the search has nothing left to do.

point-groups · The fourteen Bravais lattices Seven indices in 40, and one lattice at each. For every index to 40, how many sublattices of a cubic lattice there are and how many of them the full cubic point group carries to itself. The first number runs into the hundreds; the second is nought at almost every index and one at 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 27, 32. A cubic point group is forty-eight conditions on a sublattice, and forty-eight conditions leave very little. The richest point group in three dimensions has the poorest arithmetic of copies, and the two are the same fact.

The richest group has the poorest arithmetic

A plane group with no symmetry has seven hundred and sixty-two sublattices to grow by; one with a six-fold axis and mirrors has eight. Take the trend to its end in space and a cubic group has six to index forty — one at every cube, one at twice a cube, one at four times a cube, and nothing anywhere else. Every operation of a point group is a condition, and forty-eight conditions leave almost nothing.

space-groups · Isomorphic subgroups

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

HolohedryGram matrixCentringSublatticeDeterminantIndexLatticePoint groupShortest vectorChange of basisCrystal classDual lattice

All concepts