Bravais lattice — where it appears
Named by 25 essays across 6 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
The step a flat surface has no room for
Seventeen becomes two hundred and thirty, and the factor of thirteen is not a matter of having more directions to work in. It comes from an operation the plane cannot hold — a translation that no choice of origin will remove.
Five lattices, and no others
A repeating grid can be oblique, rectangular, centred, square or hexagonal. That is the complete list for the plane, and the argument that closes it is a page long.
The restriction in three dimensions
Space is roomier than the plane in every other respect, so the natural expectation is that it permits more rotation orders. It permits exactly the same five, and seeing why is more interesting than the result.
Twenty-five cells, and fourteen lattices
The usual picture of the fourteen Bravais lattices is a plate of fourteen boxes, which is the answer with the argument removed. The argument is one question asked of twenty-five candidates, and the question has a computable answer.
The cell that settles the argument
Two determinations of one compound can report cells that share no number and describe the same lattice. Reduction is the procedure that decides — six integers that depend on the lattice and not on anybody's choice of axes, and that agree exactly when the lattices do.
Five parallelohedra, and no others
The cell that needs no basis and no convention has, in three dimensions, exactly five shapes. The fourteen Bravais lattices produce all five between them — and which one a lattice gives is not decided by which of the fourteen it is.
The three that stay cubic
A lattice in space has far more sublattices than one in the plane — 651 of index sixteen against 31 — and almost none of them keeps the symmetry it came from. The ones that do exist at indices m³, twice m³ and four times m³, there is exactly one at each, and they are the primitive, face-centred and body-centred cubic lattices, arrived at by asking which sublattices keep a symmetry rather than by enumerating centrings.
Every plane lattice is its own dual
The dual of a lattice has the inverse Gram matrix, and in two dimensions the inverse is the adjugate over the determinant — which is what one particular change of basis does to a Gram. So a plane lattice's dual is the lattice itself, turned through a right angle and scaled, for every lattice with no exception. In three dimensions it is a condition, and the face-centred and body-centred cubic lattices are duals of each other rather than of themselves.
One perfect form in space
Which lattice packs spheres most densely is a question about a maximum over a continuum, and Voronoi turned it into a rank calculation and a sign check. A lattice is a local maximum exactly when its shortest vectors pin its shape down completely and its inverse can be written over them with positive coefficients. Searching every reduced integer form of minimum two finds one such lattice in the plane and one in space.
The shapes a lattice in space can thin to
In the plane, which indices admit a sublattice of the same shape is a question about which integers a quadratic form represents, and Fermat answered it. In space the question collapses: taking determinants shows the index is always a perfect cube, so there is nothing to represent. What is left is how many there are at each cube — and for a hexagonal lattice, whether there are any at all depends on one number.
Thirty-two from fourteen matrices
Write the fourteen Bravais lattices as Gram matrices, ask each one which integer matrices preserve it, and take every subgroup of every answer: five hundred and ten of them. Sort those by how many operations of each kind they contain — which a determinant and a trace decide — and thirty-two answers come out. They are the crystal classes, from a construction in which no point group is ever named.
The halving a lattice will not permit
Admit time reversal and a lattice splits into points that leave the moments alone and points that reverse them. The second set is a coset of a subgroup of index two, and every lattice has exactly seven of those, whatever its shape. What differs is how many of the seven the lattice's own symmetry survives — and the face-centred cubic lattice survives none of them.
Seventy-three, without a search
The unit a space group is built from is a point group together with the lattice it acts on, and there are seventy-three of them. Getting there looks like it needs conjugacy in GL(3,ℤ), which is a search this collection tried and abandoned. It does not: every finite group of integer matrices carries a canonical larger group that says which lattice it belongs to, and once that is computed the search has nothing left to do.
The richest group has the poorest arithmetic
A plane group with no symmetry has seven hundred and sixty-two sublattices to grow by; one with a six-fold axis and mirrors has eight. Take the trend to its end in space and a cubic group has six to index forty — one at every cube, one at twice a cube, one at four times a cube, and nothing anywhere else. Every operation of a point group is a condition, and forty-eight conditions leave almost nothing.
A normaliser must permute the axes
The space groups were counted with a small set of changes of basis, and past the monoclinic system nothing had shown that set was the whole normaliser. It is, and the reason is geometric: a change of basis that carries a lattice's group to itself must carry each rotation axis to a rotation axis, so it permutes a finite set of vectors, and past the monoclinic system three of them pin it down. Every such permutation tried, the eleven finite normalisers turn out to be exactly the matrices with entries −1, 0 and 1, and 219 and 230 stand without any table behind them.
Three on a plane, and never four
A reflection plane in a space group carries one operation for each class of lattice vector lying in it, and a face-centred lattice has planes holding two independent centring vectors — enough for four. None of those planes is ever a mirror. The fourteen lattices decide the question without the two hundred and thirty: one, two or three operations on a plane, and never four — with the three on every mirror plane of the rhombohedral lattice, where the Tables' own hexagonal axes put them and the letters have no name for them.
Only two and three can centre a lattice
The centring letters P, A, B, C, I, F and R are usually a list brought to the Bravais lattices. They can be derived instead: a centring is a subspace of the lattice reduced modulo a prime, and a centring that keeps a crystal system's symmetry is a subspace its holohedry leaves invariant. Enumerating every one for the seven holohedries and the primes up to seven gives exactly the fourteen, with new lattices only at two and three. The reason is the crystallographic restriction, one step removed: every holohedry has an order made of twos and threes.
The body-centred hypercube is the checkerboard lattice
In three dimensions the centring letters come out as the subspaces a holohedry keeps modulo a prime, and only two and three make new lattices. In four dimensions the same census, run on the six lattices whose symmetry groups are maximal, finds a prime that the three-dimensional argument never could: five centres A₄ into its dual. It also finds that the most familiar centring does not survive the extra dimension. The body-centred hypercubic lattice is not a centred hypercube at all: its body centre is exactly as far away as an edge, and it is D₄, with three times the symmetry.
A whole star needs a cubic box
A periodic box for a cubic crystal holds only the wavevectors its own lattice allows, and a box chosen to hold one wavevector usually holds one arm of its star and not the others. One arm of the face centre X fits in two cells; all three need eight. One arm of a third along an axis fits in three; the whole star needs twenty-seven. The smallest box that holds a whole star always keeps the cube's full symmetry, so a calculation either pays for the cube or reports a symmetry its box imposed.
![Every four-dimensional lattice with a five-fold rotation, on one interval. The lattices with a five-fold rotation in four dimensions are one ring, ℤ[ζ₅], with the form Tr(a·x·x̄), and the number t = log(a/σ(a)) / 2 log φ, folded into the interval from 0 to 1, says which lattice a is. The dots are the members with a = u + v√5 for u up to 9, 8 distinct lattices. The two ends are A₄* and A₄, with 240 symmetries each; every point between has 20. The arcs join each member to the one a centring by fifths makes of it, its reflection t ↦ 1 − t.](/f/every-four-dimensional-lattice-with-a-five-fold-rotation-on-one-interval-cc0b2586.svg)
A five-fold lattice has one free number
In four dimensions a lattice can have a five-fold rotation, and A₄ and its dual both do. Every other lattice with one turns out to be the same ring, the integers of the fifth roots of unity, with a single number deciding its shape. Folded onto an interval, the number runs from A₄* at one end to A₄ at the other, and every lattice strictly between has twenty symmetries. Centring by fifths does not make a new lattice. It reflects the interval end to end, exchanging A₄ with A₄* and pairing every other lattice with a partner, and no lattice sits at the middle to be its own.
A cubic cell has fourteen chances to fail
In the plane, deciding whether a measured cell is square meant two steps up a short diagram, and dividing the error rate between them fixed the test. In space, a primitive cubic cell sits on ten strata joined by fourteen steps on ten different paths, and a walk that tests every step at five per cent calls more than a quarter of true cubic cells something less. Dividing the level by the steps of one path is not enough and dividing it by all fourteen is too much. Measured directly, the right level is two-thirds of a per cent a step, and calibrated that way the walk notices a tetragonal distortion more often than the single test it replaces.
![Every six-dimensional lattice with a seven-fold rotation, on one torus. The lattices with a rotation of order seven in six dimensions are the ring ℤ[ζ₇] with three positive weights, one on each complex line it spans. Up to scale and isometry the weights live on a torus, drawn as a sixty-degree rhombus with opposite sides glued, shaded by how well each lattice packs spheres. The Galois automorphism turns the torus a third of a turn about three points, on the long diagonal: A₆* with 10080 symmetries, A₆ with 10080, and the ideal (1 − ζ)² with 672, the densest lattice in the family. The small dots are integral members, each with 28 symmetries.](/f/every-six-dimensional-lattice-with-a-seven-fold-rotation-on-one-torus-551a6153.svg)
A seven-fold lattice lives on a folded torus
In six dimensions a lattice can have a seven-fold rotation, and every one that does is the integers of the seventh roots of unity with three weights on it. Up to scale the weights live on a hexagonal torus that a Galois symmetry folds by a third-turn, and the fold has three fixed points: A₆*, A₆, and a third lattice that packs better than either. Centring by sevenths is no longer a reflection, as fifths was in four dimensions. It moves every lattice a third of the way along the torus and carries the three special ones round in a cycle.
The densest eleven-fold lattice is not its own dual
Every ten-dimensional lattice with an eleven-fold rotation is one ring with five weights, and its shapes form a four-dimensional torus folded by a Galois rotation of order five. The seven-fold essay predicted five special lattices, the powers of 1 − ζ, cycled by centring, and all of that holds. What does not carry over is its best result. In six dimensions the densest seven-fold lattice was the one duality fixes. In ten, duality fixes (1 − ζ)³, and the densest is (1 − ζ)², whose dual is (1 − ζ)⁴.
Thirteen-fold, and nothing is its own dual
Every twelve-dimensional lattice with a thirteen-fold rotation is one ring with six weights, and its shapes form a five-dimensional torus folded six ways. The fold has six fixed points, the powers of 1 − ζ, and duality fixes none of them, as in four dimensions and unlike six and ten: it pairs them off. The eleven-fold essay asked whether a longer cycle would let a higher power take over as the densest. It does not. (1 − ζ)² is the densest member at seven, at eleven and at thirteen, whatever duality does.
The centring survives the limit
Stretch a body-centred tetragonal lattice until its axes are equal and it becomes body-centred cubic; stretch it further and it becomes face-centred cubic. No stretching of a primitive tetragonal lattice reaches either. Which of the fourteen lattices can be deformed into which is decided by the subgroups of each lattice's own group, and the answer keeps track of centring in a way the familiar chain of crystal systems does not.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
HolohedryCentringGram matrixDual latticeSublatticeHigher-dimensional latticeKissing numberSubgroupCrystallographic restrictionDeterminantIndexLattice