Crystallography & Symmetry
patterns derived from their groups
Concept

Minkowski bound — where it appears

The integer M(n) that the order of every finite group of rational matrices in n dimensions divides, being 24 in the plane and 48 in space. It is why the classification of crystallographic groups is finite in each dimension without any bound being computed.

Named by 5 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

Five shapes, and a lattice in space has no other. The five combinatorial types a Wigner–Seitz cell can have in three dimensions — cube, hexagonal prism, rhombic dodecahedron, elongated dodecahedron, truncated octahedron — each drawn from a lattice that produces it. Fedorov proved in 1885 that there are no others, and that fourteen faces is the most any of them has, which is Minkowski's bound of 2(2ⁿ − 1) in three dimensions. Each solid here is cut out by the perpendicular bisectors of nearby lattice vectors and its volume checked against the primitive cell's, which is what catches a face that failed to appear.

Five parallelohedra, and no others

The cell that needs no basis and no convention has, in three dimensions, exactly five shapes. The fourteen Bravais lattices produce all five between them — and which one a lattice gives is not decided by which of the fourteen it is.

lattices · Wigner–Seitz cells Why the seventeen is a number at all. The classification is finite because three counts in a row are finite, and the first two are where the work is. Finitely many lattice types, because a lattice's symmetry group is a finite group of integer matrices; finitely many such groups, by Minkowski's lemma and his bound; and finitely many ways to attach translations to each, which is the extension problem. Every step is a count this site makes elsewhere — five, thirteen, seventeen — and this is the reason each of those searches was allowed to stop.

Why there is a list at all

Five lattices, seventeen groups, thirty-two classes, two hundred and thirty. Every one of those counts came out of a search that had to know when to stop, and the reason it could stop is a divisibility Minkowski proved in 1887.

restriction · Finiteness Modulo 3 injective on all thirteen, modulo 2 on 5. Minkowski's lemma says the kernel of reduction modulo an integer of at least three is torsion-free, so a finite group of integer matrices is carried faithfully into a finite group of matrices over ℤ/3 — which is why the classification is finite, before any bound is computed. The middle column checks it on every finite subgroup of GL(2,ℤ) there is: thirteen classes, no collapses. The right column is the case the lemma has to exclude. Modulo 2, minus the identity is the identity, and 8 classes lose operations.

Reduction modulo three

A finite group of integer matrices survives being reduced modulo three: no two of its operations collide. That single fact proves the classification finite without computing any bound — and modulo two it is false, refuted by the inversion centre.

restriction · Finiteness Averaging a metric over the group. The 3 pale ellipses are the unit circle carried by each element of a finite group of rational matrices — none of them a rotation, because the group has been skewed out of the orthogonal ones on purpose. Their average is the heavy ellipse, and it is invariant: MᵀAM = A for every element, exactly, in rational arithmetic. So a finite group of matrices is always a group of isometries of some inner product, and every question about how large such a group can be becomes a question about the symmetries of an ellipse. The space of invariant forms here is 1-dimensional, so up to scale the average is the only one.

The average that makes it finite

Two arguments every classification leans on are usually assumed rather than made: that a finite group of motions fixes a point, and that a finite group of integer matrices preserves a metric. They are the same trick — average over the group — and the trick fails exactly where it should.

restriction · Finiteness Two, seventeen, two hundred and thirty, and then. The number of arithmetic crystal classes and the number of crystallographic groups in each of the first six dimensions, with the second divided by the first. The classes multiply by between five and fourteen a dimension; the groups multiply by much more, and the quotient — how many groups an average class carries — goes 1.00, 1.31, 3.15, 6.74, 36.5 and 339. The last column says what is derived on this page and what is quoted: the plane in full, six of the seventy-three classes in space, and nothing at all above three dimensions, where the counts come from machine enumerations of the 1970s onwards.

Finitely many is not few

Bieberbach's third theorem says each dimension holds finitely many crystallographic groups and gives no idea how many. The counts are 2, 17, 230, 4783, 222018 and 28927922, and dividing them by the number of arithmetic classes says which of the classification's three steps supplies the explosion — the step that attaches translations, not the one that finds the matrix groups.

restriction · Finiteness

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Arithmetic crystal classEnumerationFinite groupInteger matrixGroup extensionUnimodular matrixBravais latticeBrillouin zoneCensusClassificationConjugationCounting

All concepts