Crystallography & Symmetry
patterns derived from their groups
Concept

Tiling — where it appears

A covering of the plane by shapes that overlap nowhere and leave no gap. What makes one a subject rather than a picture is that the shapes and the rule for fitting them are stated in advance, so whether a tiling exists becomes a question with an answer.

Named by 6 essays across 3 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

Four of the 980 piles in a three-cube box. A stack of unit cubes in the corner of a box, seen down the body diagonal. Every visible face is one of three rhombi and the picture is a tiling of one fixed hexagon — the same hexagon for every pile, because a pile in an a×b×c box always shows ab+bc+ca faces however it is stacked. The four here are taken at even intervals through the enumeration, from the empty box to the full one.

A facet with no energy in it

Stack cubes into the corner of a box and look down the body diagonal: the pile is a tiling of a hexagon by three rhombi, and the number of piles is a product MacMahon wrote down in 1916. Because the count is exact, so is the average pile — and the average has a flat corner meeting a rounded middle, which is the shape of an equilibrium crystal, arrived at by counting with no surface energy anywhere in the argument.

aperiodic · Entropy The sphere fixes a count; the torus fixes only a difference. Euler's relation for a trivalent net gives Σ (6 − n) pₙ = 6χ, so the surface fixes one linear combination of the face counts and nothing else. On a sphere that combination is twelve, which with no face smaller than a pentagon forces exactly twelve pentagons. On a torus it is zero, which permits any number of pentagons provided as many heptagons pay for them — and permits none at all, which is the plain hexagonal net. On a surface of two holes it is minus twelve, so heptagons become compulsory instead.

As many heptagons as pentagons

A trivalent net on a sphere must have exactly twelve pentagons. The same three lines of arithmetic on a torus give zero — which does not forbid pentagons, it makes them pay: every pentagon has to be balanced by a heptagon, and the counts are otherwise free. One rotated bond in a wrapped honeycomb makes two of each and changes nothing else.

restriction · Curvature The parity argument loses 36 pairs it had won alone. The argument that refutes ten of the twenty-one species walks round a polygon of odd size: the ring of polygons about it is a closed walk of odd length in a graph the species decides, and a bipartite graph has no such walk. With two species at a vertex the flanking pairs come from the union of two graphs, and a union of bipartite graphs need not be bipartite — so the walk stops being constrained. The fourth row is the cost: pairs whose members the argument kills on their own and which it cannot kill together.

The argument that closes eleven

Twenty-one vertex species satisfy the angle equation; a parity argument kills ten before anything is drawn, and the eleven survivors are all built. Asking the same question of tilings with two kinds of vertex, the parity argument evaporates — it constrains a walk in a graph one species decides, and two species decide the union of two graphs, which need not be bipartite. What is left is a search, and a search cannot close a count.

classification · Decidability Why a tetrahedron is not a cube cut up. The two invariants side by side. A cube's twelve right angles are each a rational part of a turn and contribute nothing; a regular tetrahedron's six edges each contribute one α, giving six. Cutting a polyhedron and rearranging the pieces cannot change the invariant, so no dissection takes one to the other however the volumes are matched. That is Hilbert's third problem, and the whole of it is one angle.

The angle that is not a fraction of a turn

Any two polygons of equal area can be cut into pieces that rearrange into each other. In space that fails, and the obstruction is a sum over edges of length against dihedral angle — zero for anything that fills space, and not zero for a regular tetrahedron. The whole argument reduces to one claim about one angle, and that claim is an integer computation: a sequence that is never divisible by three, when it would have to be.

classification · Tilings One hat patch laid out as hats, as equilateral tiles and as turtles. A patch of 36 hats found by exact cover on the kite grid, 4 of them reflected and drawn in the second colour, laid out three times. Every edge keeps its direction; short edges and long edges are given their own lengths. At short 1 and long √3 the tiles are hats, at equal lengths they are the equilateral member of the family, and at short √3 and long 1 they are turtles. In all three the same tiles touch the same neighbours along the same edges, and each layout was checked to be a tiling: 0 gaps and 0 overlaps, 0 gaps and 0 overlaps, 0 gaps and 0 overlaps among 1500 sample points, and every interior vertex surrounded by a full turn.

The hat and the turtle are one tiling

The hat has short sides and long sides; the turtle has the same turns with the two lengths exchanged, and looks nothing like it. Take a patch of hats, keep every edge pointing the way it points, stretch the short edges and shrink the long ones, and the patch becomes a patch of turtles — every tile touching the same neighbours along the same edges.

aperiodic · Monotile Identical layers, each turned by an angle no number of turns undoes. Plan views of 4 layers of a stack. Each layer is the same square lattice with one cell shaded and one direction drawn, and each is turned from the one below through the angle whose cosine is three fifths, about 53.13 degrees. That angle is not a rational part of a full turn, so no number of layers brings the drawn direction back to where it started. A tiling of space with this structure has a symmetry that turns one layer onto the next and climbs one layer, and it has no translation.

Aperiodic is two words in space

A tile is aperiodic when none of its tilings is periodic, and periodic has been read two ways: a tiling with a translation, or a tiling with infinitely many symmetries. In the plane those are one condition, provably. In space they come apart, and a prism found in 1988 sits exactly in the gap.

aperiodic · Monotile

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

AperiodicityCensusMonotileAperiodic tile setCoincidence site latticeCoordination numberCrystal netCrystallographic restrictionDefectDehn invariantDihedral angleDiscreteness

All concepts