Crystallography & Symmetry
patterns derived from their groups
Concept

Twin law — where it appears

The operation relating the two orientations of a twinned crystal: a symmetry the lattice has and the crystal does not. The available laws are therefore a coset, and their number is the index of the crystal's class in the lattice's point group less one.

Named by 9 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

p3, twinned. p3 twinned by a rotation. To the left of the composition line the motif sits where p3 puts it; to the right every copy has been carried over by the twin law, which is one of the 3 operations the hexagonal lattice has and p3 does not. 24 images on the left, 24 on the right, and the lattice runs through the line unbroken — which is exactly why a twinned crystal looks like a single one.

A twin is a symmetry the lattice has and the crystal does not

Two orientations of one structure, grown together across a boundary the lattice runs straight through. The operation relating them cannot be a symmetry of the crystal, or there would be nothing to see, and it must be a symmetry of the lattice, or the boundary would be a crack — which leaves exactly a coset, and a short computable list.

applied · Twinning Which classes can twin by merohedry, and how many ways. Every crystal class, with the number of twin laws its own lattice offers it. The index of the class in the point group of its lattice is the number of orientations available; 25 of the thirty-two have more than one, and the 7 holohedral classes have exactly one — their crystal already has every symmetry their lattice has, so there is nothing left over to twin by. The names along the right are the old mineralogical ones: hemihedral for half, tetartohedral for a quarter.

Twenty-five of the thirty-two can twin, and seven cannot

The number of twin laws available to a crystal is the index of its class in the point group of its lattice, minus one. Doing that arithmetic for all thirty-two classes takes a moment and produces a census with a sharp edge on it — the seven classes that cannot twin this way are exactly the seven that already use everything their lattice has.

applied · Twinning The twin laws of class 32. The point group of the lattice of class 32 has 24 operations and the class has 6, so it splits into 4 cosets: the crystal itself, and 3 twin laws. Every operation in a block produces the identical second orientation, which is why the block and not the operation is the law.

Quartz has exactly three twin laws, and its lattice is why

Class 32 on a hexagonal lattice has index four, so three twin laws and no more. They turn out to be the three the mineralogists named — Dauphiné, Brazil and the combination of the two — and reading quartz's lattice off its class instead of measuring it would have produced one law where there are three.

applied · Twinning p3, single and twinned. Left, the diffraction pattern of a single crystal of p3. Right, the same crystal twinned, with 50 per cent of it in one orientation. Not one spot has moved — the twin law is a symmetry of the lattice, so the two reciprocal lattices lie exactly on top of one another — and 72 of the 81 reflections drawn have changed intensity. At a fifty-fifty twin the pattern acquires the full symmetry of the lattice's point group and is indistinguishable from a crystal that genuinely has it.

A merohedral twin moves no spot at all

The twin law is a symmetry of the lattice, so the two individuals have reciprocal lattices lying exactly on top of one another. Nothing splits, nothing appears in a new place, and the only thing that changes is that pairs of intensities which were different have been averaged — which produces a diffraction pattern with a symmetry the crystal does not have and no sign that anything is wrong.

applied · Twinning Σ5: two square lattices at 36.87°. Two square lattices, one turned through 36.87° about a shared point. At this angle one point in 5 lands exactly on a point of the other lattice — 29 of the 149 drawn — and those shared points are themselves a lattice, the coincidence site lattice, of index 5. The angle comes from tan(θ/2) = 1/3, and Σ is the odd part of 3² + 1² = 10. Nothing here is measured: whether a point is shared is decided by an integer congruence.

Turn a lattice against itself and almost nothing lines up

Two copies of one lattice rotated about a shared point share that point and, at almost every angle, no other. At a discrete set of angles they share a whole sublattice — one point in three, or five, or seven — and a grain boundary built on such an orientation costs a fraction of what a general one costs, because a fraction of the atoms are already where both sides want them.

applied · Interfaces 5 units of 70.53°: 7.36° left. 5 tetrahedral units of face-centred cubic metal, each the mirror image of its neighbour in a {111} plane, arranged about a common ⟨110⟩ edge. The angle between two such planes is arccos(1/3) = 70.53°, computed from the plane normals rather than quoted, and 5 of them come to 352.64°. The shaded sector is what is left over: 7.36°, or 2.04 per cent of a full turn, which must be taken up by strain, by a gap, or by a defect along the axis.

Five copies, and the gap they leave

Gold, silver and silicon grow particles with a five-fold axis down the middle, out of a lattice that forbids one. Nothing is violated: five tetrahedral pieces of ordinary face-centred metal, each the mirror image of its neighbour, come to three hundred and fifty-two and a half degrees rather than three hundred and sixty — and the seven degrees left over have to go somewhere.

restriction · Local symmetry monoclinic: 9 twin laws, 1 of them exact. The twin laws of a monoclinic lattice: a two-fold about the row [uvw] paired with the plane (hkl) it is meant to be a mirror in, kept when the twin index is at most six and the obliquity at most six degrees, which are Friedel's own limits and are a convention rather than a theorem. 9 of the 9 are listed. The index n is how many lattice nodes there are per node the operation restores, computed from the integers and checked against the sublattice built from the plane and the row. The obliquity is the angle between the row and the plane's normal: 1 of these laws have none, and for those the operation restores a sublattice exactly.

The index and the angle a twin misses by

Whether a crystal will twin on a given operation is decided by its lattice, not by its structure. Two numbers decide it: how many lattice nodes there are per node the operation restores, and how far the operation is from being a symmetry at all. Both are computed from integers, and one of them is a fiction that has to be labelled as one.

applied · Twinning 3m → 1: the two directions a wall between domains may take. The difference between the strains of two domains, sampled around a circle of directions: the first colour where that direction is stretched, the second where it is compressed. The two solid lines are the directions where it is neither, and those are the only orientations a straight wall between the two domains can take without straining itself — Sapriel's condition, one dimension down from the planes it is usually written for. There are exactly two, and that is not luck: the two domains are images of one another under the parent group, so their strains have the same area change and their difference changes no area at all. A form that changes no area takes both signs, and its zero set is a pair of directions.

The walls a strain permits

Two domains of different shape can only meet along a line neither of them stretches. That condition is a quadratic in a direction, so a pair of domains has exactly two permissible walls — and the reason there are always two rather than sometimes none is that their strains differ by no area at all.

applied · Domains Every wall is a frieze. Each ferroelastic descent, with the frieze group of each of the two walls its domains permit. A wall is periodic along its length and bounded across it, so its symmetry group is one of the seven — the classification this collection derived early as the same argument on a strip, arriving here as a fact about interfaces. The last column counts the operations in the wall's group that exchange the two domains rather than fixing them: a wall is unchanged by having its sides swapped, so those belong to it, and they are why a wall is often more symmetric than either domain.

The wall has a group of its own

A boundary between two domains is periodic along its length and bounded across it, so its symmetry is a frieze. The seven, derived here early on as an exercise on a strip, turn out to be the classification of interfaces.

applied · Domains

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

CosetHolohedryMerohedryDomain wallFriedel lawIndexMisorientationSpontaneous strainSublatticeClosureCoincidence site latticeCompatibility

All concepts