Voltage — where it appears
Named by 4 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
A structure with the distances thrown away
Keep which atoms are joined and throw away where they are, and what is left is an infinite graph that can be written on a postcard: a few vertices, a few edges, and a pair of integers on each. Two things about that writing-down are free, and neither of them changes the net.
Every net with one vertex, counted
A net is a few vertices, a few edges and a pair of integers on each, so a census is available: fix the numbers, bound the integers, enumerate. Two edges give exactly one net at every bound. Three give three, then nineteen, then a hundred and forty-three — and the question changes.
The symmetry a net was written with
A net has no coordinates, so its symmetry is whatever its best drawing has. This collection measured that by handing the drawing to a detector — and the detector tests a fixed list of matrices, so the answer depended on which pair of translations the voltages had been written against. The honeycomb came back as p6m, or p2, or cmm, or nothing, one net and four answers.
Every net with two vertices, counted
The one-vertex census could not contain the honeycomb, because the honeycomb has two vertices in its cell. Adding the second one closes a family at two nets, removes the floor of p2 entirely, makes a third of the members undrawable, and forces the census to refuse a kind of description the first one never met: an honest quotient graph written on twice the cell it needs.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Change of basisCrystal netQuotient graphBarycentric placementGraph isomorphismCensusBasis reductionFree actionGauge freedomHolohedryLattice automorphismMetric tensor