Crystallography & Symmetry
patterns derived from their groups
Concept

Lattice automorphism — where it appears

An integer matrix preserving a lattice's metric, so that it maps the lattice onto itself and keeps every length. The set of them is the lattice's holohedry, and enumerating it is what makes the fourteen Bravais types countable rather than quotable.

Named by 7 essays across 4 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

The round trip, on Pnma. 8 operations were generated from the standard generators of Pnma; the orbit of three points in general position was formed, the group was discarded, and 8 operations were rediscovered from the 24 points alone. The two sets are identical, which is what the figure asserts.

Forgetting a group in three dimensions

For three phases this site said its machinery was two-dimensional and decided nothing about a space group. That was true, and it was a limit rather than a principle — nothing in the decidability argument mentions the number two.

space-groups · Space groups The fourteen Bravais lattices. All fourteen lattices: triclinic P, with 2 symmetries; monoclinic P, with 4 symmetries; monoclinic C, with 4 symmetries; orthorhombic P, with 8 symmetries; orthorhombic C, with 8 symmetries; orthorhombic I, with 8 symmetries; orthorhombic F, with 8 symmetries; tetragonal P, with 16 symmetries; tetragonal I, with 16 symmetries; rhombohedral P, with 12 symmetries; hexagonal P, with 24 symmetries; cubic P, with 48 symmetries; cubic I, with 48 symmetries; cubic F, with 48 symmetries. The corner points are the conventional cell; the points in the second colour are the centring translations, drawn at every position inside the cell rather than one per face. The cell shapes are the picture's, chosen so no two systems look alike; only the angles a system is defined by mean anything.

Twenty-five cells, and fourteen lattices

The usual picture of the fourteen Bravais lattices is a plate of fourteen boxes, which is the answer with the argument removed. The argument is one question asked of twenty-five candidates, and the question has a computable answer.

lattices · The fourteen Bravais lattices 4 lattices. 4 lattices: cubic P, with 48 symmetries; cubic C, with 16 symmetries; cubic I, with 48 symmetries; cubic F, with 48 symmetries. The corner points are the conventional cell; the points in the second colour are the centring translations, drawn at every position inside the cell rather than one per face. The cell shapes are the picture's, chosen so no two systems look alike; only the angles a system is defined by mean anything.

Forty-eight becomes sixteen

Centre one face of a cube and the four threefold axes along its body diagonals are gone. That sentence is usually offered as a fact to accept; it is a computation whose answer is a number, and the number says which lattice you got instead.

lattices · The fourteen Bravais lattices Why the seventeen is a number at all. The classification is finite because three counts in a row are finite, and the first two are where the work is. Finitely many lattice types, because a lattice's symmetry group is a finite group of integer matrices; finitely many such groups, by Minkowski's lemma and his bound; and finitely many ways to attach translations to each, which is the extension problem. Every step is a count this site makes elsewhere — five, thirteen, seventeen — and this is the reason each of those searches was allowed to stop.

Why there is a list at all

Five lattices, seventeen groups, thirty-two classes, two hundred and thirty. Every one of those counts came out of a search that had to know when to stop, and the reason it could stop is a divisibility Minkowski proved in 1887.

restriction · Finiteness square: 3 dislocations, 2 stable. The short lattice vectors of the square lattice, grouped into orbits under its own automorphism group of 8 operations. Two vectors of one orbit are the same defect seen from different directions, so the number of kinds of dislocation is the number of orbits — 3 out to 4 times the shortest squared length. Each orbit has its own colour. Solid arrows are stable: no pair of shorter lattice vectors adds to them with a smaller total of |b|². Dashed ones split, and 1 of the orbits do. Which splits is decided by comparing integers; that the energy goes as |b|² at all is Frank's rule and comes from elasticity, not from here.

How many dislocations a lattice has

A circuit round a defect comes back to the wrong lattice point, and the amount by which it misses is a lattice vector. That much is quantised. The next question has a number for an answer: how many *different* dislocations are there? Two Burgers vectors related by an operation of the point group are one defect seen twice, so the answer is a count of orbits.

applied · Defects monoclinic: 9 twin laws, 1 of them exact. The twin laws of a monoclinic lattice: a two-fold about the row [uvw] paired with the plane (hkl) it is meant to be a mirror in, kept when the twin index is at most six and the obliquity at most six degrees, which are Friedel's own limits and are a convention rather than a theorem. 9 of the 9 are listed. The index n is how many lattice nodes there are per node the operation restores, computed from the integers and checked against the sublattice built from the plane and the row. The obliquity is the angle between the row and the plane's normal: 1 of these laws have none, and for those the operation restores a sublattice exactly.

The index and the angle a twin misses by

Whether a crystal will twin on a given operation is decided by its lattice, not by its structure. Two numbers decide it: how many lattice nodes there are per node the operation restores, and how far the operation is from being a symmetry at all. Both are computed from integers, and one of them is a fiction that has to be labelled as one.

applied · Twinning One net, six descriptions, four different answers about its symmetry. The honeycomb written against six bases of ℤ², all of them the same net. The detector tests each lattice type's holohedry in standard position, so a symmetry written against another basis is a matrix that is not in the list and is never tried — and the answer comes back as p6m, or an unnamed group of order four, or p2, or cmm, depending on how the voltages were typed. The metric column is the form the net's own edges make, inverted; the reduced column is that form after Lagrange–Gauss reduction, and it is the same in every row, which is what makes the last column a property of the net.

The symmetry a net was written with

A net has no coordinates, so its symmetry is whatever its best drawing has. This collection measured that by handing the drawing to a detector — and the detector tests a fixed list of matrices, so the answer depended on which pair of translations the voltages had been written against. The honeycomb came back as p6m, or p2, or cmm, or nothing, one net and four answers.

applied · Nets

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

HolohedryMetric tensorCentringCrystal systemEnumerationInteger matrixUnimodular matrixAccidental symmetryArithmetic crystal classBarycentric placementBasis reductionBody diagonal

All concepts