Crystallography & Symmetry
patterns derived from their groups
Concept

Metric tensor — where it appears

The table of dot products of a basis, which holds every length and angle a lattice has and no orientation whatever. Two lattices are the same lattice exactly when their reduced metrics agree, entry for entry.

Named by 12 essays across 6 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

Two habits of {101̅}, one set of angles. The same 12 faces of class 6/mmm, grown to different distances from the centre. The outline changes completely and not one interfacial angle moves, because a face's orientation is set by the lattice and its extent by how fast it grew. That is Steno's law, and it is the reason a goniometer measures something about the substance rather than about the specimen.

The angles belong to the substance, the shape to the specimen

Two crystals of the same mineral can look nothing like each other and still have exactly the same angles between corresponding faces. That is the oldest quantitative law in the subject, and what it measures turns out to be the shape of the unit cell — which means a brass instrument from 1809 was reading lattice parameters a century before anyone knew there were any.

applied · Forms The round trip, on Pnma. 8 operations were generated from the standard generators of Pnma; the orbit of three points in general position was formed, the group was discarded, and 8 operations were rediscovered from the 24 points alone. The two sets are identical, which is what the figure asserts.

Forgetting a group in three dimensions

For three phases this site said its machinery was two-dimensional and decided nothing about a space group. That was true, and it was a limit rather than a principle — nothing in the decidability argument mentions the number two.

space-groups · Space groups The fourteen Bravais lattices. All fourteen lattices: triclinic P, with 2 symmetries; monoclinic P, with 4 symmetries; monoclinic C, with 4 symmetries; orthorhombic P, with 8 symmetries; orthorhombic C, with 8 symmetries; orthorhombic I, with 8 symmetries; orthorhombic F, with 8 symmetries; tetragonal P, with 16 symmetries; tetragonal I, with 16 symmetries; rhombohedral P, with 12 symmetries; hexagonal P, with 24 symmetries; cubic P, with 48 symmetries; cubic I, with 48 symmetries; cubic F, with 48 symmetries. The corner points are the conventional cell; the points in the second colour are the centring translations, drawn at every position inside the cell rather than one per face. The cell shapes are the picture's, chosen so no two systems look alike; only the angles a system is defined by mean anything.

Twenty-five cells, and fourteen lattices

The usual picture of the fourteen Bravais lattices is a plate of fourteen boxes, which is the answer with the argument removed. The argument is one question asked of twenty-five candidates, and the question has a computable answer.

lattices · The fourteen Bravais lattices 4 lattices. 4 lattices: cubic P, with 48 symmetries; cubic C, with 16 symmetries; cubic I, with 48 symmetries; cubic F, with 48 symmetries. The corner points are the conventional cell; the points in the second colour are the centring translations, drawn at every position inside the cell rather than one per face. The cell shapes are the picture's, chosen so no two systems look alike; only the angles a system is defined by mean anything.

Forty-eight becomes sixteen

Centre one face of a cube and the four threefold axes along its body diagonals are gone. That sentence is usually offered as a fact to accept; it is a computation whose answer is a number, and the number says which lattice you got instead.

lattices · The fourteen Bravais lattices The thirty-two, in both notations. Each class with the symbol crystallography uses and the symbol spectroscopy uses, both derived from the class's own matrices. The Hermann–Mauguin symbol is a report on three families of directions, read in an order the lattice system fixes. The Schoenflies symbol is a report on a construction: a principal axis of order n, whether there are n twofold axes across it, and which mirrors were added. Neither can be computed from the other without going back to the group, which is why the two lists are set beside each other rather than one derived from the other.

One class, two names

Hermann–Mauguin names directions and Schoenflies names a construction, and the two are derived here from the same integer matrices by computations that share no step. Neither can be obtained from the other without going back to the group — which is why a molecule has one kind of symbol and a crystal has both.

point-groups · Crystal classes Averaging a metric over the group. The 3 pale ellipses are the unit circle carried by each element of a finite group of rational matrices — none of them a rotation, because the group has been skewed out of the orthogonal ones on purpose. Their average is the heavy ellipse, and it is invariant: MᵀAM = A for every element, exactly, in rational arithmetic. So a finite group of matrices is always a group of isometries of some inner product, and every question about how large such a group can be becomes a question about the symmetries of an ellipse. The space of invariant forms here is 1-dimensional, so up to scale the average is the only one.

The average that makes it finite

Two arguments every classification leans on are usually assumed rather than made: that a finite group of motions fixes a point, and that a finite group of integer matrices preserves a metric. They are the same trick — average over the group — and the trick fails exactly where it should.

restriction · Finiteness One net, six descriptions, four different answers about its symmetry. The honeycomb written against six bases of ℤ², all of them the same net. The detector tests each lattice type's holohedry in standard position, so a symmetry written against another basis is a matrix that is not in the list and is never tried — and the answer comes back as p6m, or an unnamed group of order four, or p2, or cmm, depending on how the voltages were typed. The metric column is the form the net's own edges make, inverted; the reduced column is that form after Lagrange–Gauss reduction, and it is the same in every row, which is what makes the last column a property of the net.

The symmetry a net was written with

A net has no coordinates, so its symmetry is whatever its best drawing has. This collection measured that by handing the drawing to a detector — and the detector tests a fixed list of matrices, so the answer depended on which pair of translations the voltages had been written against. The honeycomb came back as p6m, or p2, or cmm, or nothing, one net and four answers.

applied · Nets One change of basis turns a Gram into its own adjugate. For each Gram matrix: the matrix after the basis change by a right-angle rotation, and the adjugate. They are equal, always — and the adjugate is the determinant times the inverse, which is the dual lattice's Gram. So the dual is the same lattice on a rotated basis, scaled by one over the determinant. Five rows are the named plane lattice types and the rest have entries picked at random, because the claim is an identity in integers and not a property of the five.

Every plane lattice is its own dual

The dual of a lattice has the inverse Gram matrix, and in two dimensions the inverse is the adjugate over the determinant — which is what one particular change of basis does to a Gram. So a plane lattice's dual is the lattice itself, turned through a right angle and scaled, for every lattice with no exception. In three dimensions it is a condition, and the face-centred and body-centred cubic lattices are duals of each other rather than of themselves.

lattices · Lattice Four groups whose description count a metric can raise. Every plane group, the number of ways of writing one arrangement down on the lattice the group requires, and the number on the most symmetric lattice it may sit on. Eight groups already occupy the most symmetric lattice available to them and have nowhere to go. Four have a metric that raises the count, by two and in one case by six. The starred rows belong to groups whose normaliser has a free direction, where the quantity is a count of grid points rather than an index and cannot be compared.

The normaliser is not a function of the group

How many ways there are of writing one structure down is computed from the group and printed in a table beside its name. It is not a property of the group. Draw a p2 pattern on a hexagonal cell rather than an oblique one and the number goes from four to twenty-four, with nothing done to the group at all.

operations · Normalisers Seventy-two positions and the sets they fall into. Every plane group with the number of its Wyckoff positions, and the number of sets those positions fall into when the positions a normaliser exchanges are counted once: on the cell the group requires, on the most symmetric cell it may sit on, and under every change of basis carrying the group onto itself. 72 positions become 53 sets on the required cells and 51 on the best ones, and the last column never goes lower. The two groups a special cell changes are pmm and cmm.

The same site under two names

A structure report puts each atom on a Wyckoff position, and two correct reports of one crystal can name different positions. The positions that can trade places are exactly the ones the normaliser exchanges — and which those are depends on the cell as measured, not only on the group.

operations · Normalisers Free going down, two conditions going up. The edge between p2 and p4 in the diagram of maximal translationengleiche relations, read in both directions. Downwards it costs nothing: the quarter-turns are discarded and the lattice is exactly the lattice that was there, so every p4 pattern contains a p2 pattern. Upwards the added quarter-turns must carry the lattice onto itself, which forces the cell to have equal edges at a right angle — two conditions on a general oblique cell, which has only two parameters to give. So a p2 structure has a p4 supergroup exactly when its measured cell happens to be square, and the question is about the metric rather than about the group.

Going up costs the cell a parameter

The usual asymmetry — finitely many maximal subgroups below, infinitely many minimal supergroups above — is false in both halves for a plane group. Both directions are infinite and equinumerous index by index. The real asymmetry is that 17 of the 31 edges cost the lattice a parameter going up and nothing going down.

operations · Subgroups An orbit on a parabola, discrete and cocompact. The images of the origin under the group generated by two commuting affine maps of the plane: A slides one step along x and lifts y by the x it started at plus a half, and B is the translation by one in y. The images are the points with whole-number first coordinate and second coordinate a whole number above half the square of it, so the large dots lie on the dashed parabola and the small ones are the rest of the orbit. No two distinct images come closer than 1.000, and no point of the square between the axes lies farther than 0.610 from one — so the action is discrete and its quotient is compact, which is exactly what Bieberbach's first theorem asks for.

Straight lines, and no distances

Every finiteness met so far rests on the motions preserving a metric, because the trick that produces one is an average and an average needs something to average over. Keep the straight lines and drop the distances, and Bieberbach's first theorem is false in the plane — by an example two lines long, whose group is the plane's own translations and whose translations have rank one.

restriction · Finiteness

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

HolohedryLattice automorphismConjugationOrbitBravais latticeCentringChange of basisCrystal systemEquivalent originFinite groupFixed pointGram matrix

All concepts