Lattice type — where it appears
Named by 4 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
Centring, and why cm is not pm
A centred cell has a lattice point in the middle and twice the area it needs, and crystallography prefers it anyway. The preference has a price, and the price is paid in reflections that vanish for reasons that have nothing to do with the crystal.
Centring, counted as a sublattice
Adding the centre of every cell to a lattice produces another lattice, containing the first with index two. Doing it to each of the five in turn shows why the list is five rather than ten, and why only one of the five has a centred description worth keeping.
The space every lattice lives in
Five lattices in the plane is the number of *kinds*. The number of lattices is a continuum — and it has a shape: one two-dimensional region with two corners, three edges and an interior, where the five kinds turn out to be a region, three arcs and two points rather than five things of one sort.
The normaliser is not a function of the group
How many ways there are of writing one structure down is computed from the group and printed in a table beside its name. It is not a property of the group. Draw a p2 pattern on a hexagonal cell rather than an oblique one and the number goes from four to twenty-four, with nothing done to the group at all.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
HolohedryBasis reductionCentred latticeCentringPrimitive cellChange of basisConjugationCosetEquivalent originFundamental domainIndexMeasure