Tolerance — where it appears
Named by 6 essays across 4 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
Near-symmetry, and the tolerance that is not here
Symmetry decided by integer arithmetic never needs a threshold. Measured coordinates do not arrive that way, and the moment a tolerance is introduced the answer stops being a fact about the structure and becomes a fact about the threshold.
The Alhambra question
Textbooks say the Alhambra contains all seventeen wallpaper groups. Careful analysts of the same building have counted eleven, thirteen, fourteen and seventeen — and the disagreement is not about the mathematics but about what counts as an instance.
Two different lattices never coincide, and the question becomes how nearly
Grow one crystal on another and their spacings are in a ratio that no measurement ever makes rational, so exact coincidence is unavailable in principle. What is left is the best rational approximation inside a tolerable repeat — a quantity that jumps rather than drifts as the ratio changes, and whose acceptability is decided by elasticity rather than by arithmetic.
The figure of merit a supercell always beats
Indexing a powder pattern returns a ranked list rather than an answer, and the ranking needs a number. The obvious number — how well the cell accounts for the lines — is exactly the number a supercell cannot lose on, because the supercell's grid contains the true cell's grid and the discrepancies are identical to every digit. What has to be paid for is the lines nobody saw.
Two conditions are not one condition twice
Whether a plane structure has a higher-symmetry supergroup is decided by its measured cell, and the obvious measure — how many standard uncertainties the cell sits from a right angle, or from equal edges — cannot rank the candidates on its own. A square needs two conditions and a rectangle one, so a single distance means different things on each; counted properly, a square can score above the equal-edged lattices that contain it, and walking up the diagram one condition at a time is the reading that keeps the ranking coherent, at a price that has to be paid in its error rate.
A cubic cell has fourteen chances to fail
In the plane, deciding whether a measured cell is square meant two steps up a short diagram, and dividing the error rate between them fixed the test. In space, a primitive cubic cell sits on ten strata joined by fourteen steps on ten different paths, and a walk that tests every step at five per cent calls more than a quarter of true cubic cells something less. Dividing the level by the steps of one path is not enough and dividing it by all fourteen is too much. Measured directly, the right level is two-thirds of a per cent a step, and calibrated that way the walk notices a tetragonal distortion more often than the single test it replaces.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Accidental symmetryHolohedryLattice typeMetric tensorSubgroupThe AlhambraBravais latticeCoincidence site latticeColour symmetryContinued fractionEpitaxyFigure of merit