Tolerance — where it appears
Named by 4 essays across 3 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
Near-symmetry, and the tolerance that is not here
Every claim on this site is decided by integer arithmetic, so no threshold is ever chosen. Measured coordinates do not arrive that way, and the moment a tolerance is introduced the answer stops being a fact about the structure and becomes a fact about the threshold.
The Alhambra question
Textbooks say the Alhambra contains all seventeen wallpaper groups. Careful analysts of the same building have counted eleven, thirteen, fourteen and seventeen — and the disagreement is not about the mathematics but about what counts as an instance.
Two different lattices never coincide, and the question becomes how nearly
Grow one crystal on another and their spacings are in a ratio that no measurement ever makes rational, so exact coincidence is unavailable in principle. What is left is the best rational approximation inside a tolerable repeat — a quantity that jumps rather than drifts as the ratio changes, and whose acceptability is decided by elasticity rather than by arithmetic.
The figure of merit a supercell always beats
Indexing a powder pattern returns a ranked list rather than an answer, and the ranking needs a number. The obvious number — how well the cell accounts for the lines — is exactly the number a supercell cannot lose on, because the supercell's grid contains the true cell's grid and the discrepancies are identical to every digit. What has to be paid for is the lines nobody saw.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Accidental symmetryThe AlhambraCoincidence site latticeColour symmetryContinued fractionEpitaxyFigure of meritGolden ratioGroup frequencyIncommensurateIndexingMisfit